diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-07-02 12:58:26 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-07-02 12:58:26 -0700 |
commit | a48ad6e7a35dc3f3b521249204daf4c9427628e5 (patch) | |
tree | f8251773a7175fcb42ed87ed8a4e21b1449b1e68 /Documentation/dev-tools | |
parent | 019b3fd94ba73d3ac615f0537440b81f129821f6 (diff) | |
parent | 1d71307a6f94df3750f8f884545a769e227172fe (diff) |
Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-fixes-5.14-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
Pull KUnit update from Shuah Khan:
"Fixes and features:
- add support for skipped tests
- introduce kunit_kmalloc_array/kunit_kcalloc() helpers
- add gnu_printf specifiers
- add kunit_shutdown
- add unit test for filtering suites by names
- convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
- code organization moving default config to tools/testing/kunit
- refactor of internal parser input handling
- cleanups and updates to documentation
- code cleanup related to casts"
* tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-fixes-5.14-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest: (29 commits)
kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names
kasan: test: make use of kunit_skip()
kunit: test: Add example tests which are always skipped
kunit: tool: Support skipped tests in kunit_tool
kunit: Support skipped tests
thunderbolt: test: Reinstate a few casts of bitfields
kunit: tool: internal refactor of parser input handling
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
kunit: introduce kunit_kmalloc_array/kunit_kcalloc() helpers
kunit: Remove the unused all_tests.config
kunit: Move default config from arch/um -> tools/testing/kunit
kunit: arch/um/configs: Enable KUNIT_ALL_TESTS by default
kunit: Add gnu_printf specifiers
lib/cmdline_kunit: Remove a cast which are no-longer required
kernel/sysctl-test: Remove some casts which are no-longer required
thunderbolt: test: Remove some casts which are no longer required
mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: Remove some unnecessary casts from KUnit tests
iio: Remove a cast in iio-test-format which is no longer required
device property: Remove some casts in property-entry-test
Documentation: kunit: Clean up some string casts in examples
...
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/dev-tools')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/kunit-tool.rst | 188 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst | 259 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 57 |
5 files changed, 485 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst index 25d92a9a05ea..cacb35ec658d 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ KUnit - Unit Testing for the Linux Kernel style faq tips + running_tips What is KUnit? ============== diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/kunit-tool.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/kunit-tool.rst index 29ae2fee8123..c7ff9afe407a 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/kunit-tool.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/kunit-tool.rst @@ -22,14 +22,19 @@ not require any virtualization support: it is just a regular program. What is a .kunitconfig? ======================= -It's just a defconfig that kunit_tool looks for in the base directory. -kunit_tool uses it to generate a .config as you might expect. In addition, it -verifies that the generated .config contains the CONFIG options in the -.kunitconfig; the reason it does this is so that it is easy to be sure that a -CONFIG that enables a test actually ends up in the .config. +It's just a defconfig that kunit_tool looks for in the build directory +(``.kunit`` by default). kunit_tool uses it to generate a .config as you might +expect. In addition, it verifies that the generated .config contains the CONFIG +options in the .kunitconfig; the reason it does this is so that it is easy to +be sure that a CONFIG that enables a test actually ends up in the .config. -How do I use kunit_tool? -======================== +It's also possible to pass a separate .kunitconfig fragment to kunit_tool, +which is useful if you have several different groups of tests you wish +to run independently, or if you want to use pre-defined test configs for +certain subsystems. + +Getting Started with kunit_tool +=============================== If a kunitconfig is present at the root directory, all you have to do is: @@ -48,10 +53,177 @@ However, you most likely want to use it with the following options: .. note:: This command will work even without a .kunitconfig file: if no - .kunitconfig is present, a default one will be used instead. + .kunitconfig is present, a default one will be used instead. + +If you wish to use a different .kunitconfig file (such as one provided for +testing a particular subsystem), you can pass it as an option. + +.. code-block:: bash + + ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=fs/ext4/.kunitconfig For a list of all the flags supported by kunit_tool, you can run: .. code-block:: bash ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --help + +Configuring, Building, and Running Tests +======================================== + +It's also possible to run just parts of the KUnit build process independently, +which is useful if you want to make manual changes to part of the process. + +A .config can be generated from a .kunitconfig by using the ``config`` argument +when running kunit_tool: + +.. code-block:: bash + + ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config + +Similarly, if you just want to build a KUnit kernel from the current .config, +you can use the ``build`` argument: + +.. code-block:: bash + + ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build + +And, if you already have a built UML kernel with built-in KUnit tests, you can +run the kernel and display the test results with the ``exec`` argument: + +.. code-block:: bash + + ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec + +The ``run`` command which is discussed above is equivalent to running all three +of these in sequence. + +All of these commands accept a number of optional command-line arguments. The +``--help`` flag will give a complete list of these, or keep reading this page +for a guide to some of the more useful ones. + +Parsing Test Results +==================== + +KUnit tests output their results in TAP (Test Anything Protocol) format. +kunit_tool will, when running tests, parse this output and print a summary +which is much more pleasant to read. If you wish to look at the raw test +results in TAP format, you can pass the ``--raw_output`` argument. + +.. code-block:: bash + + ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output + +.. note:: + The raw output from test runs may contain other, non-KUnit kernel log + lines. + +If you have KUnit results in their raw TAP format, you can parse them and print +the human-readable summary with the ``parse`` command for kunit_tool. This +accepts a filename for an argument, or will read from standard input. + +.. code-block:: bash + + # Reading from a file + ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /var/log/dmesg + # Reading from stdin + dmesg | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse + +This is very useful if you wish to run tests in a configuration not supported +by kunit_tool (such as on real hardware, or an unsupported architecture). + +Filtering Tests +=============== + +It's possible to run only a subset of the tests built into a kernel by passing +a filter to the ``exec`` or ``run`` commands. For example, if you only wanted +to run KUnit resource tests, you could use: + +.. code-block:: bash + + ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'kunit-resource*' + +This uses the standard glob format for wildcards. + +Running Tests on QEMU +===================== + +kunit_tool supports running tests on QEMU as well as via UML (as mentioned +elsewhere). The default way of running tests on QEMU requires two flags: + +``--arch`` + Selects a collection of configs (Kconfig as well as QEMU configs + options, etc) that allow KUnit tests to be run on the specified + architecture in a minimal way; this is usually not much slower than + using UML. The architecture argument is the same as the name of the + option passed to the ``ARCH`` variable used by Kbuild. Not all + architectures are currently supported by this flag, but can be handled + by the ``--qemu_config`` discussed later. If ``um`` is passed (or this + this flag is ignored) the tests will run via UML. Non-UML architectures, + e.g. i386, x86_64, arm, um, etc. Non-UML run on QEMU. + +``--cross_compile`` + Specifies the use of a toolchain by Kbuild. The argument passed here is + the same passed to the ``CROSS_COMPILE`` variable used by Kbuild. As a + reminder this will be the prefix for the toolchain binaries such as gcc + for example ``sparc64-linux-gnu-`` if you have the sparc toolchain + installed on your system, or + ``$HOME/toolchains/microblaze/gcc-9.2.0-nolibc/microblaze-linux/bin/microblaze-linux-`` + if you have downloaded the microblaze toolchain from the 0-day website + to a directory in your home directory called ``toolchains``. + +In many cases it is likely that you may want to run an architecture which is +not supported by the ``--arch`` flag, or you may want to just run KUnit tests +on QEMU using a non-default configuration. For this use case, you can write +your own QemuConfig. These QemuConfigs are written in Python. They must have an +import line ``from ..qemu_config import QemuArchParams`` at the top of the file +and the file must contain a variable called ``QEMU_ARCH`` that has an instance +of ``QemuArchParams`` assigned to it. An example can be seen in +``tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/x86_64.py``. + +Once you have a QemuConfig you can pass it into kunit_tool using the +``--qemu_config`` flag; when used this flag replaces the ``--arch`` flag. If we +were to do this with the ``x86_64.py`` example from above, the invocation would +look something like this: + +.. code-block:: bash + + ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \ + --timeout=60 \ + --jobs=12 \ + --qemu_config=./tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/x86_64.py + +Other Useful Options +==================== + +kunit_tool has a number of other command-line arguments which can be useful +when adapting it to fit your environment or needs. + +Some of the more useful ones are: + +``--help`` + Lists all of the available options. Note that different commands + (``config``, ``build``, ``run``, etc) will have different supported + options. Place ``--help`` before the command to list common options, + and after the command for options specific to that command. + +``--build_dir`` + Specifies the build directory that kunit_tool will use. This is where + the .kunitconfig file is located, as well as where the .config and + compiled kernel will be placed. Defaults to ``.kunit``. + +``--make_options`` + Specifies additional options to pass to ``make`` when compiling a + kernel (with the ``build`` or ``run`` commands). For example, to enable + compiler warnings, you can pass ``--make_options W=1``. + +``--alltests`` + Builds a UML kernel with all config options enabled using ``make + allyesconfig``. This allows you to run as many tests as is possible, + but is very slow and prone to breakage as new options are added or + modified. In most cases, enabling all tests which have satisfied + dependencies by adding ``CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=1`` to your + .kunitconfig is preferable. + +There are several other options (and new ones are often added), so do check +``--help`` if you're looking for something not mentioned here. diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7d99386cf94a --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +============================ +Tips For Running KUnit Tests +============================ + +Using ``kunit.py run`` ("kunit tool") +===================================== + +Running from any directory +-------------------------- + +It can be handy to create a bash function like: + +.. code-block:: bash + + function run_kunit() { + ( cd "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)" && ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run $@ ) + } + +.. note:: + Early versions of ``kunit.py`` (before 5.6) didn't work unless run from + the kernel root, hence the use of a subshell and ``cd``. + +Running a subset of tests +------------------------- + +``kunit.py run`` accepts an optional glob argument to filter tests. Currently +this only matches against suite names, but this may change in the future. + +Say that we wanted to run the sysctl tests, we could do so via: + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ echo -e 'CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y' > .kunit/.kunitconfig + $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'sysctl*' + +We're paying the cost of building more tests than we need this way, but it's +easier than fiddling with ``.kunitconfig`` files or commenting out +``kunit_suite``'s. + +However, if we wanted to define a set of tests in a less ad hoc way, the next +tip is useful. + +Defining a set of tests +----------------------- + +``kunit.py run`` (along with ``build``, and ``config``) supports a +``--kunitconfig`` flag. So if you have a set of tests that you want to run on a +regular basis (especially if they have other dependencies), you can create a +specific ``.kunitconfig`` for them. + +E.g. kunit has one for its tests: + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit/.kunitconfig + +Alternatively, if you're following the convention of naming your +file ``.kunitconfig``, you can just pass in the dir, e.g. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit + +.. note:: + This is a relatively new feature (5.12+) so we don't have any + conventions yet about on what files should be checked in versus just + kept around locally. It's up to you and your maintainer to decide if a + config is useful enough to submit (and therefore have to maintain). + +.. note:: + Having ``.kunitconfig`` fragments in a parent and child directory is + iffy. There's discussion about adding an "import" statement in these + files to make it possible to have a top-level config run tests from all + child directories. But that would mean ``.kunitconfig`` files are no + longer just simple .config fragments. + + One alternative would be to have kunit tool recursively combine configs + automagically, but tests could theoretically depend on incompatible + options, so handling that would be tricky. + +Generating code coverage reports under UML +------------------------------------------ + +.. note:: + TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): There are various issues with UML and + versions of gcc 7 and up. You're likely to run into missing ``.gcda`` + files or compile errors. We know one `faulty GCC commit + <https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/8c9434c2f9358b8b8bad2c1990edf10a21645f9d>`_ + but not how we'd go about getting this fixed. The compile errors still + need some investigation. + +.. note:: + TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): for recent versions of Linux + (5.10-5.12, maybe earlier), there's a bug with gcov counters not being + flushed in UML. This translates to very low (<1%) reported coverage. This is + related to the above issue and can be worked around by replacing the + one call to ``uml_abort()`` (it's in ``os_dump_core()``) with a plain + ``exit()``. + + +This is different from the "normal" way of getting coverage information that is +documented in Documentation/dev-tools/gcov.rst. + +Instead of enabling ``CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL=y``, we can set these options: + +.. code-block:: none + + CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y + CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y + CONFIG_GCOV=y + + +Putting it together into a copy-pastable sequence of commands: + +.. code-block:: bash + + # Append coverage options to the current config + $ echo -e "CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y\nCONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y\nCONFIG_GCOV=y" >> .kunit/.kunitconfig + $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run + # Extract the coverage information from the build dir (.kunit/) + $ lcov -t "my_kunit_tests" -o coverage.info -c -d .kunit/ + + # From here on, it's the same process as with CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL=y + # E.g. can generate an HTML report in a tmp dir like so: + $ genhtml -o /tmp/coverage_html coverage.info + + +If your installed version of gcc doesn't work, you can tweak the steps: + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --make_options=CC=/usr/bin/gcc-6 + $ lcov -t "my_kunit_tests" -o coverage.info -c -d .kunit/ --gcov-tool=/usr/bin/gcov-6 + + +Running tests manually +====================== + +Running tests without using ``kunit.py run`` is also an important use case. +Currently it's your only option if you want to test on architectures other than +UML. + +As running the tests under UML is fairly straightforward (configure and compile +the kernel, run the ``./linux`` binary), this section will focus on testing +non-UML architectures. + + +Running built-in tests +---------------------- + +When setting tests to ``=y``, the tests will run as part of boot and print +results to dmesg in TAP format. So you just need to add your tests to your +``.config``, build and boot your kernel as normal. + +So if we compiled our kernel with: + +.. code-block:: none + + CONFIG_KUNIT=y + CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=y + +Then we'd see output like this in dmesg signaling the test ran and passed: + +.. code-block:: none + + TAP version 14 + 1..1 + # Subtest: example + 1..1 + # example_simple_test: initializing + ok 1 - example_simple_test + ok 1 - example + +Running tests as modules +------------------------ + +Depending on the tests, you can build them as loadable modules. + +For example, we'd change the config options from before to + +.. code-block:: none + + CONFIG_KUNIT=y + CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=m + +Then after booting into our kernel, we can run the test via + +.. code-block:: none + + $ modprobe kunit-example-test + +This will then cause it to print TAP output to stdout. + +.. note:: + The ``modprobe`` will *not* have a non-zero exit code if any test + failed (as of 5.13). But ``kunit.py parse`` would, see below. + +.. note:: + You can set ``CONFIG_KUNIT=m`` as well, however, some features will not + work and thus some tests might break. Ideally tests would specify they + depend on ``KUNIT=y`` in their ``Kconfig``'s, but this is an edge case + most test authors won't think about. + As of 5.13, the only difference is that ``current->kunit_test`` will + not exist. + +Pretty-printing results +----------------------- + +You can use ``kunit.py parse`` to parse dmesg for test output and print out +results in the same familiar format that ``kunit.py run`` does. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /var/log/dmesg + + +Retrieving per suite results +---------------------------- + +Regardless of how you're running your tests, you can enable +``CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS`` to expose per-suite TAP-formatted results: + +.. code-block:: none + + CONFIG_KUNIT=y + CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=m + CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS=y + +The results for each suite will be exposed under +``/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results``. +So using our example config: + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ modprobe kunit-example-test > /dev/null + $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/example/results + ... <TAP output> ... + + # After removing the module, the corresponding files will go away + $ modprobe -r kunit-example-test + $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/example/results + /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/example/results: No such file or directory + +Generating code coverage reports +-------------------------------- + +See Documentation/dev-tools/gcov.rst for details on how to do this. + +The only vaguely KUnit-specific advice here is that you probably want to build +your tests as modules. That way you can isolate the coverage from tests from +other code executed during boot, e.g. + +.. code-block:: bash + + # Reset coverage counters before running the test. + $ echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/gcov/reset + $ modprobe kunit-example-test diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst index 63ef7b625c13..1e00f9226f74 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ A good starting point for a ``.kunitconfig`` is the KUnit defconfig: .. code-block:: bash cd $PATH_TO_LINUX_REPO - cp arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig .kunitconfig + cp tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config .kunitconfig You can then add any other Kconfig options you wish, e.g.: @@ -236,5 +236,7 @@ Next Steps ========== * Check out the Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst page for tips on writing idiomatic KUnit tests. +* Check out the :doc:`running_tips` page for tips on + how to make running KUnit tests easier. * Optional: see the :doc:`usage` page for a more in-depth explanation of KUnit. diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst index 3ee7ab91f712..63f1bb89ebf5 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst @@ -467,10 +467,9 @@ fictitious example for ``sha1sum(1)`` .. code-block:: c - /* Note: the cast is to satisfy overly strict type-checking. */ #define TEST_SHA1(in, want) \ sha1sum(in, out); \ - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, want, "sha1sum(%s)", in); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, want, "sha1sum(%s)", in); char out[40]; TEST_SHA1("hello world", "2aae6c35c94fcfb415dbe95f408b9ce91ee846ed"); @@ -509,7 +508,7 @@ In some cases, it can be helpful to write a *table-driven test* instead, e.g. }; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cases); ++i) { sha1sum(cases[i].str, out); - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, cases[i].sha1, + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, cases[i].sha1, "sha1sum(%s)", cases[i].str); } @@ -570,7 +569,7 @@ Reusing the same ``cases`` array from above, we can write the test as a struct sha1_test_case *test_param = (struct sha1_test_case *)(test->param_value); sha1sum(test_param->str, out); - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, test_param->sha1, + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, test_param->sha1, "sha1sum(%s)", test_param->str); } @@ -611,17 +610,45 @@ non-UML architectures: None of these are reasons not to run your KUnit tests on real hardware; they are only things to be aware of when doing so. -The biggest impediment will likely be that certain KUnit features and -infrastructure may not support your target environment. For example, at this -time the KUnit Wrapper (``tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py``) does not work outside -of UML. Unfortunately, there is no way around this. Using UML (or even just a -particular architecture) allows us to make a lot of assumptions that make it -possible to do things which might otherwise be impossible. - -Nevertheless, all core KUnit framework features are fully supported on all -architectures, and using them is straightforward: all you need to do is to take -your kunitconfig, your Kconfig options for the tests you would like to run, and -merge them into whatever config your are using for your platform. That's it! +Currently, the KUnit Wrapper (``tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py``) (aka +kunit_tool) only fully supports running tests inside of UML and QEMU; however, +this is only due to our own time limitations as humans working on KUnit. It is +entirely possible to support other emulators and even actual hardware, but for +now QEMU and UML is what is fully supported within the KUnit Wrapper. Again, to +be clear, this is just the Wrapper. The actualy KUnit tests and the KUnit +library they are written in is fully architecture agnostic and can be used in +virtually any setup, you just won't have the benefit of typing a single command +out of the box and having everything magically work perfectly. + +Again, all core KUnit framework features are fully supported on all +architectures, and using them is straightforward: Most popular architectures +are supported directly in the KUnit Wrapper via QEMU. Currently, supported +architectures on QEMU include: + +* i386 +* x86_64 +* arm +* arm64 +* alpha +* powerpc +* riscv +* s390 +* sparc + +In order to run KUnit tests on one of these architectures via QEMU with the +KUnit wrapper, all you need to do is specify the flags ``--arch`` and +``--cross_compile`` when invoking the KUnit Wrapper. For example, we could run +the default KUnit tests on ARM in the following manner (assuming we have an ARM +toolchain installed): + +.. code-block:: bash + + tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --timeout=60 --jobs=12 --arch=arm --cross_compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- + +Alternatively, if you want to run your tests on real hardware or in some other +emulation environment, all you need to do is to take your kunitconfig, your +Kconfig options for the tests you would like to run, and merge them into +whatever config your are using for your platform. That's it! For example, let's say you have the following kunitconfig: |