summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-04-11bcache: remove PTR_CACHEChristoph Hellwig
Remove the PTR_CACHE inline and replace it with a direct dereference of c->cache. (Coly Li: fix the typo from PTR_BUCKET to PTR_CACHE in commit log) Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210411134316.80274-3-colyli@suse.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-02-10bcache: Give btree_io_wq correct semantics againKai Krakow
Before killing `btree_io_wq`, the queue was allocated using `create_singlethread_workqueue()` which has `WQ_MEM_RECLAIM`. After killing it, it no longer had this property but `system_wq` is not single threaded. Let's combine both worlds and make it multi threaded but able to reclaim memory. Cc: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Kai Krakow <kai@kaishome.de> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-02-10Revert "bcache: Kill btree_io_wq"Kai Krakow
This reverts commit 56b30770b27d54d68ad51eccc6d888282b568cee. With the btree using the `system_wq`, I seem to see a lot more desktop latency than I should. After some more investigation, it looks like the original assumption of 56b3077 no longer is true, and bcache has a very high potential of congesting the `system_wq`. In turn, this introduces laggy desktop performance, IO stalls (at least with btrfs), and input events may be delayed. So let's revert this. It's important to note that the semantics of using `system_wq` previously mean that `btree_io_wq` should be created before and destroyed after other bcache wqs to keep the same assumptions. Cc: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Kai Krakow <kai@kaishome.de> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-10-02bcache: remove embedded struct cache_sb from struct cache_setColy Li
Since bcache code was merged into mainline kerrnel, each cache set only as one single cache in it. The multiple caches framework is here but the code is far from completed. Considering the multiple copies of cached data can also be stored on e.g. md raid1 devices, it is unnecessary to support multiple caches in one cache set indeed. The previous preparation patches fix the dependencies of explicitly making a cache set only have single cache. Now we don't have to maintain an embedded partial super block in struct cache_set, the in-memory super block can be directly referenced from struct cache. This patch removes the embedded struct cache_sb from struct cache_set, and fixes all locations where the superb lock was referenced from this removed super block by referencing the in-memory super block of struct cache. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-10-02bcache: only use block_bytes() on struct cacheColy Li
Because struct cache_set and struct cache both have struct cache_sb, therefore macro block_bytes() can be used on both of them. When removing the embedded struct cache_sb from struct cache_set, this macro won't be used on struct cache_set anymore. This patch unifies all block_bytes() usage only on struct cache, this is one of the preparation to remove the embedded struct cache_sb from struct cache_set. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-10-02bcache: remove for_each_cache()Coly Li
Since now each cache_set explicitly has single cache, for_each_cache() is unnecessary. This patch removes this macro, and update all locations where it is used, and makes sure all code logic still being consistent. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-10-02bcache: remove 'int n' from parameter list of bch_bucket_alloc_set()Coly Li
The parameter 'int n' from bch_bucket_alloc_set() is not cleared defined. From the code comments n is the number of buckets to alloc, but from the code itself 'n' is the maximum cache to iterate. Indeed all the locations where bch_bucket_alloc_set() is called, 'n' is alwasy 1. This patch removes the confused and unnecessary 'int n' from parameter list of bch_bucket_alloc_set(), and explicitly allocates only 1 bucket for its caller. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-10-02bcache: check c->root with IS_ERR_OR_NULL() in mca_reserve()Dongsheng Yang
In mca_reserve(c) macro, we are checking root whether is NULL or not. But that's not enough, when we read the root node in run_cache_set(), if we got an error in bch_btree_node_read_done(), we will return ERR_PTR(-EIO) to c->root. And then we will go continue to unregister, but before calling unregister_shrinker(&c->shrink), there is a possibility to call bch_mca_count(), and we would get a crash with call trace like that: [ 2149.876008] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000000b5 ... ... [ 2150.598931] Call trace: [ 2150.606439] bch_mca_count+0x58/0x98 [escache] [ 2150.615866] do_shrink_slab+0x54/0x310 [ 2150.624429] shrink_slab+0x248/0x2d0 [ 2150.632633] drop_slab_node+0x54/0x88 [ 2150.640746] drop_slab+0x50/0x88 [ 2150.648228] drop_caches_sysctl_handler+0xf0/0x118 [ 2150.657219] proc_sys_call_handler.isra.18+0xb8/0x110 [ 2150.666342] proc_sys_write+0x40/0x50 [ 2150.673889] __vfs_write+0x48/0x90 [ 2150.681095] vfs_write+0xac/0x1b8 [ 2150.688145] ksys_write+0x6c/0xd0 [ 2150.695127] __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x30 [ 2150.702749] el0_svc_handler+0xa0/0x128 [ 2150.710296] el0_svc+0x8/0xc Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-07-25bcache: handle cache set verify_ondisk properly for bucket size > 8MBColy Li
In bch_btree_cache_alloc() when CONFIG_BCACHE_DEBUG is configured, allocate memory for c->verify_ondisk may fail if the bucket size > 8MB, which will require __get_free_pages() to allocate continuous pages with order > 11 (the default MAX_ORDER of Linux buddy allocator). Such over size allocation will fail, and cause 2 problems, - When CONFIG_BCACHE_DEBUG is configured, bch_btree_verify() does not work, because c->verify_ondisk is NULL and bch_btree_verify() returns immediately. - bch_btree_cache_alloc() will fail due to c->verify_ondisk allocation failed, then the whole cache device registration fails. And because of this failure, the first problem of bch_btree_verify() has no chance to be triggered. This patch fixes the above problem by two means, 1) If pages allocation of c->verify_ondisk fails, set it to NULL and returns bch_btree_cache_alloc() with -ENOMEM. 2) When calling __get_free_pages() to allocate c->verify_ondisk pages, use ilog2(meta_bucket_pages(&c->sb)) to make sure ilog2() will always generate a pages order <= MAX_ORDER (or CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER). Then the buddy system won't directly reject the allocation request. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-07-25bcache: allocate meta data pages as compound pagesColy Li
There are some meta data of bcache are allocated by multiple pages, and they are used as bio bv_page for I/Os to the cache device. for example cache_set->uuids, cache->disk_buckets, journal_write->data, bset_tree->data. For such meta data memory, all the allocated pages should be treated as a single memory block. Then the memory management and underlying I/O code can treat them more clearly. This patch adds __GFP_COMP flag to all the location allocating >0 order pages for the above mentioned meta data. Then their pages are treated as compound pages now. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-07-01block: rename generic_make_request to submit_bio_noacctChristoph Hellwig
generic_make_request has always been very confusingly misnamed, so rename it to submit_bio_noacct to make it clear that it is submit_bio minus accounting and a few checks. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-06-14bcache: fix potential deadlock problem in btree_gc_coalesceZhiqiang Liu
coccicheck reports: drivers/md//bcache/btree.c:1538:1-7: preceding lock on line 1417 In btree_gc_coalesce func, if the coalescing process fails, we will goto to out_nocoalesce tag directly without releasing new_nodes[i]->write_lock. Then, it will cause a deadlock when trying to acquire new_nodes[i]-> write_lock for freeing new_nodes[i] before return. btree_gc_coalesce func details as follows: if alloc new_nodes[i] fails: goto out_nocoalesce; // obtain new_nodes[i]->write_lock mutex_lock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock) // main coalescing process for (i = nodes - 1; i > 0; --i) [snipped] if coalescing process fails: // Here, directly goto out_nocoalesce // tag will cause a deadlock goto out_nocoalesce; [snipped] // release new_nodes[i]->write_lock mutex_unlock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock) // coalesing succ, return return; out_nocoalesce: btree_node_free(new_nodes[i]) // free new_nodes[i] // obtain new_nodes[i]->write_lock mutex_lock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock); // set flag for reuse clear_bit(BTREE_NODE_dirty, &ew_nodes[i]->flags); // release new_nodes[i]->write_lock mutex_unlock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock); To fix the problem, we add a new tag 'out_unlock_nocoalesce' for releasing new_nodes[i]->write_lock before out_nocoalesce tag. If coalescing process fails, we will go to out_unlock_nocoalesce tag for releasing new_nodes[i]->write_lock before free new_nodes[i] in out_nocoalesce tag. (Coly Li helps to clean up commit log format.) Fixes: 2a285686c109816 ("bcache: btree locking rework") Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-05-27bcache: Convert pr_<level> uses to a more typical styleJoe Perches
Remove the trailing newline from the define of pr_fmt and add newlines to the uses. Miscellanea: o Convert bch_bkey_dump from multiple uses of pr_err to pr_cont as the earlier conversion was inappropriate done causing multiple lines to be emitted where only a single output line was desired o Use vsprintf extension %pV in bch_cache_set_error to avoid multiple line output where only a single line output was desired o Coalesce formats Fixes: 6ae63e3501c4 ("bcache: replace printk() by pr_*() routines") Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-05-27bcache: remove redundant variables i and nColin Ian King
Variables i and n are being assigned but are never used. They are redundant and can be removed. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-03-22bcache: optimize barrier usage for atomic operationsColy Li
The idea of this patch is from Davidlohr Bueso, he posts a patch for bcache to optimize barrier usage for read-modify-write atomic bitops. Indeed such optimization can also apply on other locations where smp_mb() is used before or after an atomic operation. This patch replaces smp_mb() with smp_mb__before_atomic() or smp_mb__after_atomic() in btree.c and writeback.c, where it is used to synchronize memory cache just earlier on other cores. Although the locations are not on hot code path, it is always not bad to mkae things a little better. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-03-22bcache: make bch_btree_check() to be multithreadedColy Li
When registering a cache device, bch_btree_check() is called to check all btree nodes, to make sure the btree is consistent and not corrupted. bch_btree_check() is recursively executed in a single thread, when there are a lot of data cached and the btree is huge, it may take very long time to check all the btree nodes. In my testing, I observed it took around 50 minutes to finish bch_btree_check(). When checking the bcache btree nodes, the cache set is not running yet, and indeed the whole tree is in read-only state, it is safe to create multiple threads to check the btree in parallel. This patch tries to create multiple threads, and each thread tries to one-by-one check the sub-tree indexed by a key from the btree root node. The parallel thread number depends on how many keys in the btree root node. At most BCH_BTR_CHKTHREAD_MAX (64) threads can be created, but in practice is should be min(cpu-number/2, root-node-keys-number). Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-03-22bcache: add bcache_ prefix to btree_root() and btree() macrosColy Li
This patch changes macro btree_root() and btree() to bcache_btree_root() and bcache_btree(), to avoid potential generic name clash in future. NOTE: for product kernel maintainers, this patch can be skipped if you feel the rename stuffs introduce inconvenince to patch backport. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-03-22bcache: move macro btree() and btree_root() into btree.hColy Li
In order to accelerate bcache registration speed, the macro btree() and btree_root() will be referenced out of btree.c. This patch moves them from btree.c into btree.h with other relative function declaration in btree.h, for the following changes. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-03-02Revert "bcache: ignore pending signals when creating gc and allocator thread"Jens Axboe
This reverts commit 0b96da639a4874311e9b5156405f69ef9fc3bef8. We can't just go flushing random signals, under the assumption that the OOM killer will just do something else. It's not safe from the OOM perspective, and it could also cause other signals to get randomly lost. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-02-13bcache: ignore pending signals when creating gc and allocator threadColy Li
When run a cache set, all the bcache btree node of this cache set will be checked by bch_btree_check(). If the bcache btree is very large, iterating all the btree nodes will occupy too much system memory and the bcache registering process might be selected and killed by system OOM killer. kthread_run() will fail if current process has pending signal, therefore the kthread creating in run_cache_set() for gc and allocator kernel threads are very probably failed for a very large bcache btree. Indeed such OOM is safe and the registering process will exit after the registration done. Therefore this patch flushes pending signals during the cache set start up, specificly in bch_cache_allocator_start() and bch_gc_thread_start(), to make sure run_cache_set() won't fail for large cahced data set. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-01-23bcache: reap from tail of c->btree_cache in bch_mca_scan()Coly Li
When shrink btree node cache from c->btree_cache in bch_mca_scan(), no matter the selected node is reaped or not, it will be rotated from the head to the tail of c->btree_cache list. But in bcache journal code, when flushing the btree nodes with oldest journal entry, btree nodes are iterated and slected from the tail of c->btree_cache list in btree_flush_write(). The list_rotate_left() in bch_mca_scan() will make btree_flush_write() iterate more nodes in c->btree_list in reverse order. This patch just reaps the selected btree node cache, and not move it from the head to the tail of c->btree_cache list. Then bch_mca_scan() will not mess up c->btree_cache list to btree_flush_write(). Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-01-23bcache: reap c->btree_cache_freeable from the tail in bch_mca_scan()Coly Li
In order to skip the most recently freed btree node cahce, currently in bch_mca_scan() the first 3 caches in c->btree_cache_freeable list are skipped when shrinking bcache node caches in bch_mca_scan(). The related code in bch_mca_scan() is, 737 list_for_each_entry_safe(b, t, &c->btree_cache_freeable, list) { 738 if (nr <= 0) 739 goto out; 740 741 if (++i > 3 && 742 !mca_reap(b, 0, false)) { lines free cache memory 746 } 747 nr--; 748 } The problem is, if virtual memory code calls bch_mca_scan() and the calculated 'nr' is 1 or 2, then in the above loop, nothing will be shunk. In such case, if slub/slab manager calls bch_mca_scan() for many times with small scan number, it does not help to shrink cache memory and just wasts CPU cycles. This patch just selects btree node caches from tail of the c->btree_cache_freeable list, then the newly freed host cache can still be allocated by mca_alloc(), and at least 1 node can be shunk. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-01-23bcache: remove member accessed from struct btreeColy Li
The member 'accessed' of struct btree is used in bch_mca_scan() when shrinking btree node caches. The original idea is, if b->accessed is set, clean it and look at next btree node cache from c->btree_cache list, and only shrink the caches whose b->accessed is cleaned. Then only cold btree node cache will be shrunk. But when I/O pressure is high, it is very probably that b->accessed of a btree node cache will be set again in bch_btree_node_get() before bch_mca_scan() selects it again. Then there is no chance for bch_mca_scan() to shrink enough memory back to slub or slab system. This patch removes member accessed from struct btree, then once a btree node ache is selected, it will be immediately shunk. By this change, bch_mca_scan() may release btree node cahce more efficiently. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-11-18Revert "bcache: fix fifo index swapping condition in journal_pin_cmp()"Jens Axboe
Coly says: "Guoju Fang talked to me today, he told me this change was unnecessary and I was over-thought. Then I realize fifo_idx() uses a mask to handle the array index overflow condition, so the index swap in journal_pin_cmp() won't happen. And yes, Guoju and Kent are correct. Since you already applied this patch, can you please to remove this patch from your for-next branch? This single patch does not break thing, but it is unecessary at this moment." This reverts commit c0e0954e909c17b43d176ab219fc598964616ae6. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-11-13bcache: at least try to shrink 1 node in bch_mca_scan()Coly Li
In bch_mca_scan(), the number of shrinking btree node is calculated by code like this, unsigned long nr = sc->nr_to_scan; nr /= c->btree_pages; nr = min_t(unsigned long, nr, mca_can_free(c)); variable sc->nr_to_scan is number of objects (here is bcache B+tree nodes' number) to shrink, and pointer variable sc is sent from memory management code as parametr of a callback. If sc->nr_to_scan is smaller than c->btree_pages, after the above calculation, variable 'nr' will be 0 and nothing will be shrunk. It is frequeently observed that only 1 or 2 is set to sc->nr_to_scan and make nr to be zero. Then bch_mca_scan() will do nothing more then acquiring and releasing mutex c->bucket_lock. This patch checkes whether nr is 0 after the above calculation, if 0 is the result then set 1 to variable 'n'. Then at least bch_mca_scan() will try to shrink a single B+tree node. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-11-13bcache: add code comments in bch_btree_leaf_dirty()Coly Li
This patch adds code comments in bch_btree_leaf_dirty() to explain why w->journal should always reference the eldest journal pin of all the writing bkeys in the btree node. To make the bcache journal code to be easier to be understood. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-11-13bcache: fix a lost wake-up problem caused by mca_cannibalize_lockGuoju Fang
This patch fix a lost wake-up problem caused by the race between mca_cannibalize_lock and bch_cannibalize_unlock. Consider two processes, A and B. Process A is executing mca_cannibalize_lock, while process B takes c->btree_cache_alloc_lock and is executing bch_cannibalize_unlock. The problem happens that after process A executes cmpxchg and will execute prepare_to_wait. In this timeslice process B executes wake_up, but after that process A executes prepare_to_wait and set the state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE. Then process A goes to sleep but no one will wake up it. This problem may cause bcache device to dead. Signed-off-by: Guoju Fang <fangguoju@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-11-13bcache: fix fifo index swapping condition in journal_pin_cmp()Coly Li
Fifo structure journal.pin is implemented by a cycle buffer, if the back index reaches highest location of the cycle buffer, it will be swapped to 0. Once the swapping happens, it means a smaller fifo index might be associated to a newer journal entry. So the btree node with oldest journal entry won't be selected in bch_btree_leaf_dirty() to reference the dirty B+tree leaf node. This problem may cause bcache journal won't protect unflushed oldest B+tree dirty leaf node in power failure, and this B+tree leaf node is possible to beinconsistent after reboot from power failure. This patch fixes the fifo index comparing logic in journal_pin_cmp(), to avoid potential corrupted B+tree leaf node when the back index of journal pin is swapped. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-06-28bcache: fix race in btree_flush_write()Coly Li
There is a race between mca_reap(), btree_node_free() and journal code btree_flush_write(), which results very rare and strange deadlock or panic and are very hard to reproduce. Let me explain how the race happens. In btree_flush_write() one btree node with oldest journal pin is selected, then it is flushed to cache device, the select-and-flush is a two steps operation. Between these two steps, there are something may happen inside the race window, - The selected btree node was reaped by mca_reap() and allocated to other requesters for other btree node. - The slected btree node was selected, flushed and released by mca shrink callback bch_mca_scan(). When btree_flush_write() tries to flush the selected btree node, firstly b->write_lock is held by mutex_lock(). If the race happens and the memory of selected btree node is allocated to other btree node, if that btree node's write_lock is held already, a deadlock very probably happens here. A worse case is the memory of the selected btree node is released, then all references to this btree node (e.g. b->write_lock) will trigger NULL pointer deference panic. This race was introduced in commit cafe56359144 ("bcache: A block layer cache"), and enlarged by commit c4dc2497d50d ("bcache: fix high CPU occupancy during journal"), which selected 128 btree nodes and flushed them one-by-one in a quite long time period. Such race is not easy to reproduce before. On a Lenovo SR650 server with 48 Xeon cores, and configure 1 NVMe SSD as cache device, a MD raid0 device assembled by 3 NVMe SSDs as backing device, this race can be observed around every 10,000 times btree_flush_write() gets called. Both deadlock and kernel panic all happened as aftermath of the race. The idea of the fix is to add a btree flag BTREE_NODE_journal_flush. It is set when selecting btree nodes, and cleared after btree nodes flushed. Then when mca_reap() selects a btree node with this bit set, this btree node will be skipped. Since mca_reap() only reaps btree node without BTREE_NODE_journal_flush flag, such race is avoided. Once corner case should be noticed, that is btree_node_free(). It might be called in some error handling code path. For example the following code piece from btree_split(), 2149 err_free2: 2150 bkey_put(b->c, &n2->key); 2151 btree_node_free(n2); 2152 rw_unlock(true, n2); 2153 err_free1: 2154 bkey_put(b->c, &n1->key); 2155 btree_node_free(n1); 2156 rw_unlock(true, n1); At line 2151 and 2155, the btree node n2 and n1 are released without mac_reap(), so BTREE_NODE_journal_flush also needs to be checked here. If btree_node_free() is called directly in such error handling path, and the selected btree node has BTREE_NODE_journal_flush bit set, just delay for 1 us and retry again. In this case this btree node won't be skipped, just retry until the BTREE_NODE_journal_flush bit cleared, and free the btree node memory. Fixes: cafe56359144 ("bcache: A block layer cache") Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reported-and-tested-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-06-28bcache: add comments for mutex_lock(&b->write_lock)Coly Li
When accessing or modifying BTREE_NODE_dirty bit, it is not always necessary to acquire b->write_lock. In bch_btree_cache_free() and mca_reap() acquiring b->write_lock is necessary, and this patch adds comments to explain why mutex_lock(&b->write_lock) is necessary for checking or clearing BTREE_NODE_dirty bit there. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-06-28bcache: only clear BTREE_NODE_dirty bit when it is setColy Li
In bch_btree_cache_free() and btree_node_free(), BTREE_NODE_dirty is always set no matter btree node is dirty or not. The code looks like this, if (btree_node_dirty(b)) btree_complete_write(b, btree_current_write(b)); clear_bit(BTREE_NODE_dirty, &b->flags); Indeed if btree_node_dirty(b) returns false, it means BTREE_NODE_dirty bit is cleared, then it is unnecessary to clear the bit again. This patch only clears BTREE_NODE_dirty when btree_node_dirty(b) is true (the bit is set), to save a few CPU cycles. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-06-28bcache: remove unncessary code in bch_btree_keys_init()Coly Li
Function bch_btree_keys_init() initializes b->set[].size and b->set[].data to zero. As the code comments indicates, these code indeed is unncessary, because both struct btree_keys and struct bset_tree are nested embedded into struct btree, when struct btree is filled with 0 bits by kzalloc() in mca_bucket_alloc(), b->set[].size and b->set[].data are initialized to 0 (a.k.a NULL) already. This patch removes the redundant code, and add comments in bch_btree_keys_init() and mca_bucket_alloc() to explain why it's safe. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-04-30block: remove the i argument to bio_for_each_segment_allChristoph Hellwig
We only have two callers that need the integer loop iterator, and they can easily maintain it themselves. Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-04-30bcache: clean up do_btree_node_write a bitChristoph Hellwig
Use a variable containing the buffer address instead of the to be removed integer iterator from bio_for_each_segment_all. Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-04-24bcache: fix wrong usage use-after-freed on keylist in out_nocoalesce branch ↵Shenghui Wang
of btree_gc_coalesce Elements of keylist should be accessed before the list is freed. Move bch_keylist_free() calling after the while loop to avoid wrong content accessed. Signed-off-by: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-02-15block: allow bio_for_each_segment_all() to iterate over multi-page bvecMing Lei
This patch introduces one extra iterator variable to bio_for_each_segment_all(), then we can allow bio_for_each_segment_all() to iterate over multi-page bvec. Given it is just one mechannical & simple change on all bio_for_each_segment_all() users, this patch does tree-wide change in one single patch, so that we can avoid to use a temporary helper for this conversion. Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-12-13bcache: add comment for cache_set->fill_iterShenghui Wang
We have the following define for btree iterator: struct btree_iter { size_t size, used; #ifdef CONFIG_BCACHE_DEBUG struct btree_keys *b; #endif struct btree_iter_set { struct bkey *k, *end; } data[MAX_BSETS]; }; We can see that the length of data[] field is static MAX_BSETS, which is defined as 4 currently. But a btree node on disk could have too many bsets for an iterator to fit on the stack - maybe far more that MAX_BSETS. Have to dynamically allocate space to host more btree_iter_sets. bch_cache_set_alloc() will make sure the pool cache_set->fill_iter can allocate an iterator equipped with enough room that can host (sb.bucket_size / sb.block_size) btree_iter_sets, which is more than static MAX_BSETS. bch_btree_node_read_done() will use that pool to allocate one iterator, to host many bsets in one btree node. Add more comment around cache_set->fill_iter to make code less confusing. Signed-off-by: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-10-08bcache: fix miss key refill->end in writebackTang Junhui
refill->end record the last key of writeback, for example, at the first time, keys (1,128K) to (1,1024K) are flush to the backend device, but the end key (1,1024K) is not included, since the bellow code: if (bkey_cmp(k, refill->end) >= 0) { ret = MAP_DONE; goto out; } And in the next time when we refill writeback keybuf again, we searched key start from (1,1024K), and got a key bigger than it, so the key (1,1024K) missed. This patch modify the above code, and let the end key to be included to the writeback key buffer. Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui.linux@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-08-11bcache: fix indent by replacing blank by tabsColy Li
bch_btree_insert_check_key() has unaligned indent, or indent by blank characters. This patch makes the indent aligned and replace blank by tabs. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-08-11bcache: style fixes for lines over 80 charactersColy Li
This patch fixes the lines over 80 characters into more lines, to minimize warnings by checkpatch.pl. There are still some lines exceed 80 characters, but it is better to be a single line and I don't change them. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-08-11bcache: add identifier names to arguments of function definitionsColy Li
There are many function definitions do not have identifier argument names, scripts/checkpatch.pl complains warnings like this, WARNING: function definition argument 'struct bcache_device *' should also have an identifier name #16735: FILE: writeback.h:120: +void bch_sectors_dirty_init(struct bcache_device *); This patch adds identifier argument names to all bcache function definitions to fix such warnings. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-08-11bcache: style fix to add a blank line after declarationsColy Li
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-08-11bcache: style fix to replace 'unsigned' by 'unsigned int'Coly Li
This patch fixes warning reported by checkpatch.pl by replacing 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int'. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-08-09bcache: avoid unncessary cache prefetch bch_btree_node_get()Coly Li
In bch_btree_node_get() the read-in btree node will be partially prefetched into L1 cache for following bset iteration (if there is). But if the btree node read is failed, the perfetch operations will waste L1 cache space. This patch checkes whether read operation and only does cache prefetch when read I/O succeeded. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-07-27bcache: calculate the number of incremental GC nodes according to the total ↵Tang Junhui
of btree nodes This patch base on "[PATCH] bcache: finish incremental GC". Since incremental GC would stop 100ms when front side I/O comes, so when there are many btree nodes, if GC only processes constant (100) nodes each time, GC would last a long time, and the front I/Os would run out of the buckets (since no new bucket can be allocated during GC), and I/Os be blocked again. So GC should not process constant nodes, but varied nodes according to the number of btree nodes. In this patch, GC is divided into constant (100) times, so when there are many btree nodes, GC can process more nodes each time, otherwise GC will process less nodes each time (but no less than MIN_GC_NODES). Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-07-27bcache: finish incremental GCTang Junhui
In GC thread, we record the latest GC key in gc_done, which is expected to be used for incremental GC, but in currently code, we didn't realize it. When GC runs, front side IO would be blocked until the GC over, it would be a long time if there is a lot of btree nodes. This patch realizes incremental GC, the main ideal is that, when there are front side I/Os, after GC some nodes (100), we stop GC, release locker of the btree node, and go to process the front side I/Os for some times (100 ms), then go back to GC again. By this patch, when we doing GC, I/Os are not blocked all the time, and there is no obvious I/Os zero jump problem any more. Patch v2: Rename some variables and macros name as Coly suggested. Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-06-15docs: Fix some broken referencesMauro Carvalho Chehab
As we move stuff around, some doc references are broken. Fix some of them via this script: ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check --fix Manually checked if the produced result is valid, removing a few false-positives. Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-05-30bcache: convert to bioset_init()/mempool_init()Kent Overstreet
Convert bcache to embedded bio sets. Reviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-03-18bcache: Fix kernel-doc warningsBart Van Assche
Avoid that building with W=1 triggers warnings about the kernel-doc headers. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-03-18bcache: Fix indentationBart Van Assche
This patch avoids that smatch complains about inconsistent indentation. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org> Reviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>