summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2015-07-16cpufreq: tegra: Rename tegra-cpufreq to tegra20-cpufreqTuomas Tynkkynen
The Tegra124 will use a different driver for frequency scaling, so rename the old driver (which handles only Tegra20) appropriately. Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mikko.perttunen@kapsi.fi> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
2014-06-10cpufreq: tegra: update comment for clarityViresh Kumar
Tegra's driver got updated a bit (00917dd cpufreq: Tegra: implement intermediate frequency callbacks) and implements new 'intermediate freq' infrastructure of core. Above commit updated comments about when to call clk_prepare_enable(pll_x_clk) and Doug wasn't satisfied with those comments and said this: > The "Though when target-freq is intermediate freq, we don't need to > take this reference." makes me think that this function is actually > called when target-freq is intermediate freq.  I don't think it is, > right? For better clarity just make that comment more explicit about when we call tegra_target_intermediate(). Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Reported-and-reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-06-05cpufreq: Tegra: implement intermediate frequency callbacksViresh Kumar
Tegra has been switching to intermediate frequency (pll_p_clk) forever. CPUFreq core has better support for handling notifications for these frequencies and so we can adapt Tegra's driver to it. Also do a WARN() if clk_set_parent() fails while moving back to pll_x as we should have atleast restored to earlier frequency on error. Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-17cpufreq: Tegra: drop wrapper around tegra_update_cpu_speed()Viresh Kumar
Tegra has implemented an unnecessary wrapper over tegra_update_cpu_speed(), i.e. tegra_target(), which wasn't doing anything apart of calling tegra_update_cpu_speed(). Get rid of that and use tegra_target() directly. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-03-12cpufreq: add 'freq_table' in struct cpufreq_policyViresh Kumar
freq table is not per CPU but per policy, so it makes more sense to keep it within struct cpufreq_policy instead of a per-cpu variable. This patch does it. Over that, there is no need to set policy->freq_table to NULL in ->exit(), as policy structure is going to be freed soon. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-03-06cpufreq: Tegra: Use cpufreq_generic_suspend()Viresh Kumar
The cpufreq core now supports suspending and resuming of cpufreq drivers and governors during systems suspend and resume, so use the common infrastructure instead of defining special PM notifiers for the same thing. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-17cpufreq: introduce cpufreq_generic_get() routineViresh Kumar
CPUFreq drivers that use clock frameworks interface,i.e. clk_get_rate(), to get CPUs clk rate, have similar sort of code used in most of them. This patch adds a generic ->get() which will do the same thing for them. All those drivers are required to now is to set .get to cpufreq_generic_get() and set their clk pointer in policy->clk during ->init(). Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-06cpufreq: Mark ARM drivers with CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK flagViresh Kumar
Sometimes boot loaders set CPU frequency to a value outside of frequency table present with cpufreq core. In such cases CPU might be unstable if it has to run on that frequency for long duration of time and so its better to set it to a frequency which is specified in frequency table. On some systems we can't really say what frequency we're running at the moment and so for these we shouldn't check if we are running at a frequency present in frequency table. And so we really can't force this for all the cpufreq drivers. Hence we are created another flag here: CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK that will be marked by platforms which want to go for this check at boot time. Initially this is done for all ARM platforms but others may follow if required. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-11-20cpufreq: tegra: don't error target() when suspendedStephen Warren
d4019f0a92ab "cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core" added code to the cpufreq core to print an error if a cpufreq driver's .target() function returned an error. This exposed the fact that Tegra's cpufreq driver returns an error when it is ignoring requests due to the system being suspended. Modify Tegra's .target() function not to return an error in this case; this prevents the error prints. The argument is that since the suspend hook can't and doesn't inform the cpufreq core when its requests will be ignored, there's no way for the cpufreq core to squelch them, so it's not an error for the requests to keep coming. This change make the Tegra driver consistent with how the Exynos handles the same situation. Note that s5pv210-cpufreq.c probably suffers from this same issue though. Fixes: d4019f0a92ab (cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core) Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-31cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq coreViresh Kumar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for doing this work, work/tasklet/etc.. They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag: CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them. All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as double notification would happen otherwise. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-25cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routineViresh Kumar
Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-16cpufreq: tegra: use cpufreq_generic_init()Viresh Kumar
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16cpufreq: tegra: don't initialize part of policy set by coreViresh Kumar
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16cpufreq: tegra: Use generic cpufreq routinesViresh Kumar
Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used by cpufreq drivers then. This patch uses these generic routines in the Tegra driver. Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-30cpufreq: tegra: fix implementation of ->exit()Viresh Kumar
->exit() of drivers should call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr() if they have called cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr() earlier in init() and they aren't required to validate their cpufreq table in exit by calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(). Tegra's driver wasn't calling cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr() and was calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() in exit. Fix both these issues in it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-30cpufreq: tegra: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()Viresh Kumar
Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-08-23cpufreq: tegra: fix the wrong clock nameJoseph Lo
The "cpu" and "pclk_p_cclk" was a virtual clock name that was used in the legacy Tegra clock framework. It was not used after converting to CCF. Fix it as the correct clock name that we are using. Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2013-06-27Merge branch 'pm-cpufreq-arm' into pm-cpufreqRafael J. Wysocki
* pm-cpufreq-arm: cpufreq: tegra: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases cpufreq: s3c64xx: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases cpufreq: omap: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases cpufreq: imx6q: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases cpufreq: exynos: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases cpufreq: dbx500: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases cpufreq: davinci: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases cpufreq: arm-big-little: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases cpufreq: s3c2416: fix forgotten driver_data conversions
2013-06-24cpufreq: tegra: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error casesViresh Kumar
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of calling notifiers is complete. This patch fixes it. Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2013-05-27cpufreq: tegra: Don't initialize .index field of cpufreq_frequency_tableViresh Kumar
The Tegra cpufreq driver doesn't use .index field of cpufreq_frequency_table and so we don't need to initialize it. Don't initialize it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-04-08cpufreq: tegra: Move driver to drivers/cpufreqViresh Kumar
This patch moves cpufreq driver of ARM based tegra platform to drivers/cpufreq. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>