summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/Makefile.um
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-06-17um: allow not setting extra rpaths in the linux binaryJohannes Berg
There doesn't seem to be any reason for the rpath being set in the binaries, at on systems that I tested on. On the other hand, setting rpath is actually harming binaries in some cases, e.g. if using nix-based compilation environments where /lib & /lib64 are not part of the actual environment. Add a new Kconfig option (under EXPERT, for less user confusion) that allows disabling the rpath additions. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2018-12-09x86, powerpc: Remove -funit-at-a-time compiler option entirelyMasahiro Yamada
GCC 4.6 manual says: -funit-at-a-time This option is left for compatibility reasons. -funit-at-a-time has no effect, while -fno-unit-at-a-time implies -fno-toplevel-reorder and -fno-section-anchors. Enabled by default. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@sigma-star.at> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1541990120-9643-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
2018-12-09x86/um: Remove -fno-unit-at-a-time workaround for pre-4.0 GCCMasahiro Yamada
Commit cafa0010cd51 ("Raise the minimum required gcc version to 4.6") bumped the minimum GCC version to 4.6 for all architectures. '$(call cc-option,-fno-unit-at-a-time)' is now dead code since '$(cc-version) -lt 0400' is always false. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1541990120-9643-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
2018-08-24kbuild: rename LDFLAGS to KBUILD_LDFLAGSMasahiro Yamada
Commit a0f97e06a43c ("kbuild: enable 'make CFLAGS=...' to add additional options to CC") renamed CFLAGS to KBUILD_CFLAGS. Commit 222d394d30e7 ("kbuild: enable 'make AFLAGS=...' to add additional options to AS") renamed AFLAGS to KBUILD_AFLAGS. Commit 06c5040cdb13 ("kbuild: enable 'make CPPFLAGS=...' to add additional options to CPP") renamed CPPFLAGS to KBUILD_CPPFLAGS. For some reason, LDFLAGS was not renamed. Using a well-known variable like LDFLAGS may result in accidental override of the variable. Kbuild generally uses KBUILD_ prefixed variables for the internally appended options, so here is one more conversion to sanitize the naming convention. I did not touch Makefiles under tools/ since the tools build system is a different world. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2018-07-19um: remove redundant 'export LDFLAGS' in arch/x86/Makefile.umMasahiro Yamada
This is already exported by the top-level Makefile. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
2017-11-02License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no licenseGreg Kroah-Hartman
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-04-02kbuild: use relative path more to include MakefileMasahiro Yamada
Prior to this commit, it was impossible to use relative path to include Makefiles from the top level Makefile because the option "--include-dir=$(srctree)" becomes effective when Make enters into sub Makefiles. To use relative path in any places, this commit moves the option above the "sub-make" target. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
2015-01-09kbuild: do not add $(call ...) to invoke cc-version or cc-fullversionMasahiro Yamada
The macros cc-version, cc-fullversion and ld-version take no argument. It is not necessary to add $(call ...) to invoke them. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> [parisc] Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
2012-04-09um: fix linker script generationAl Viro
while we can't just use -U$(SUBARCH), we still need to kill idiotic define (implicit -Di386=1), both for SUBARCH=i386 and SUBARCH=x86/CONFIG_64BIT=n builds. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-03-25um: most of the SUBARCH uses can be killedAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> [richard@nod.at: Re-export SUBARCH in arch/um/Makefile] Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2011-11-02um: take arch/um/sys-x86 to arch/x86/umAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>