summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/mach-asm9260
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-05-15ARM: asm9260: Drop unneeded select of GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTSGeert Uytterhoeven
Support for the Alphascale ASM9260 platform depends on ARCH_MULTI_V5, and thus on ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM. As the latter selects GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS, there is no need for MACH_ASM9260 to select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200505150722.1575-5-geert+renesas@glider.be Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Cc: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2019-05-21treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Makefile/KconfigThomas Gleixner
Add SPDX license identifiers to all Make/Kconfig files which: - Have no license information of any form These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-02-25clockevents: asm9260: Fix compilation error with sparc/sparc64 allyesconfigDaniel Lezcano
The Kconfig options for the asm9260 timer is wrong as it can be selected by another platform with allyes config and thus leading to a compilation failure as some non arch related code is pulled by the compilation. Fix this by having the platform Kconfig to select the timer as it is done for the others drivers. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de> Conflicts: drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
2014-11-28ARM: add mach-asm9260Oleksij Rempel
it is low cost (?) SoC targeted for market in China and India which trying to compete with AT91SAM9G25. Here is some info: http://www.alphascale.com/index.asp?ics/615.html One of products: http://www.aliexpress.com/store/product/2014-hot-sales-FREE-SHIPPING-new-Purple-core-ARM9-development-board-ASM9260T-SDRAM-power-line/433637_1931495721.html In some cases this SoC looks similar to iMX23/iMX28. But currently it makes no sense to merge mach code of this devices. Especially because most differences are already collected mach-mxs folder. Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>