summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/samples/bpf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2020-02-26 16:22:40 -0600
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2020-03-18 12:24:19 +0100
commitf490e8aea3f03497efcee81d28fd962d431663c4 (patch)
tree52aee1fd270a47eb6afd301ed0a371643d3e1685 /samples/bpf
parentd108b132ea39cdcd63a1d6b4460fc4c7d183c7e5 (diff)
misc: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Acked-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@hpe.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200226222240.GA14474@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'samples/bpf')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions