summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/xfrm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>2019-01-09 14:37:34 +0100
committerSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>2019-01-10 09:12:48 +0100
commit35e6103861a3a970de6c84688c6e7a1f65b164ca (patch)
tree9c494e73343d835f652456faf018aa9fee0a772e /net/xfrm
parentdd9ee3444014e8f28c0eefc9fffc9ac9c5248c12 (diff)
xfrm: refine validation of template and selector families
The check assumes that in transport mode, the first templates family must match the address family of the policy selector. Syzkaller managed to build a template using MODE_ROUTEOPTIMIZATION, with ipv4-in-ipv6 chain, leading to following splat: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in xfrm_state_find+0x1db/0x1854 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888063e57aa0 by task a.out/2050 xfrm_state_find+0x1db/0x1854 xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0x100/0x1d0 xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0x108/0x1000 [..] Problem is that addresses point into flowi4 struct, but xfrm_state_find treats them as being ipv6 because it uses templ->encap_family is used (AF_INET6 in case of reproducer) rather than family (AF_INET). This patch inverts the logic: Enforce 'template family must match selector' EXCEPT for tunnel and BEET mode. In BEET and Tunnel mode, xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one will have remote/local address pointers changed to point at the addresses found in the template, rather than the flowi ones, so no oob read will occur. Reported-by: 3ntr0py1337@gmail.com Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/xfrm')
-rw-r--r--net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c13
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 277c1c46fe94..c6d26afcf89d 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1488,10 +1488,15 @@ static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family)
if (!ut[i].family)
ut[i].family = family;
- if ((ut[i].mode == XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT) &&
- (ut[i].family != prev_family))
- return -EINVAL;
-
+ switch (ut[i].mode) {
+ case XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL:
+ case XFRM_MODE_BEET:
+ break;
+ default:
+ if (ut[i].family != prev_family)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
if (ut[i].mode >= XFRM_MODE_MAX)
return -EINVAL;