diff options
| author | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> | 2017-09-10 13:41:41 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> | 2017-09-18 17:33:23 +0200 |
| commit | b0ade85165b3caeb0cd908cffe5921a39f25c243 (patch) | |
| tree | caf9d5d748d811e56b98d23bcba80b70c89f3176 /net/netfilter | |
| parent | 2bd6bf03f4c1c59381d62c61d03f6cc3fe71f66e (diff) | |
netfilter: nat: Do not use ARRAY_SIZE() on spinlocks to fix zero div
If no spinlock debugging options (CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK,
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK, CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC) are enabled on a UP
platform (e.g. m68k defconfig), arch_spinlock_t is an empty struct,
hence using ARRAY_SIZE(nf_nat_locks) causes a division by zero:
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c: In function ‘nf_nat_setup_info’:
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:432: warning: division by zero
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c: In function ‘__nf_nat_cleanup_conntrack’:
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:535: warning: division by zero
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:537: warning: division by zero
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c: In function ‘nf_nat_init’:
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:810: warning: division by zero
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:811: warning: division by zero
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:824: warning: division by zero
Fix this by using the CONNTRACK_LOCKS definition instead.
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Fixes: 8073e960a03bf7b5 ("netfilter: nat: use keyed locks")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/netfilter')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c index f393a7086025..af8345fc4fbd 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ nf_nat_setup_info(struct nf_conn *ct, srchash = hash_by_src(net, &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple); - lock = &nf_nat_locks[srchash % ARRAY_SIZE(nf_nat_locks)]; + lock = &nf_nat_locks[srchash % CONNTRACK_LOCKS]; spin_lock_bh(lock); hlist_add_head_rcu(&ct->nat_bysource, &nf_nat_bysource[srchash]); @@ -532,9 +532,9 @@ static void __nf_nat_cleanup_conntrack(struct nf_conn *ct) unsigned int h; h = hash_by_src(nf_ct_net(ct), &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple); - spin_lock_bh(&nf_nat_locks[h % ARRAY_SIZE(nf_nat_locks)]); + spin_lock_bh(&nf_nat_locks[h % CONNTRACK_LOCKS]); hlist_del_rcu(&ct->nat_bysource); - spin_unlock_bh(&nf_nat_locks[h % ARRAY_SIZE(nf_nat_locks)]); + spin_unlock_bh(&nf_nat_locks[h % CONNTRACK_LOCKS]); } static int nf_nat_proto_clean(struct nf_conn *ct, void *data) @@ -807,8 +807,8 @@ static int __init nf_nat_init(void) /* Leave them the same for the moment. */ nf_nat_htable_size = nf_conntrack_htable_size; - if (nf_nat_htable_size < ARRAY_SIZE(nf_nat_locks)) - nf_nat_htable_size = ARRAY_SIZE(nf_nat_locks); + if (nf_nat_htable_size < CONNTRACK_LOCKS) + nf_nat_htable_size = CONNTRACK_LOCKS; nf_nat_bysource = nf_ct_alloc_hashtable(&nf_nat_htable_size, 0); if (!nf_nat_bysource) @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static int __init nf_nat_init(void) return ret; } - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nf_nat_locks); i++) + for (i = 0; i < CONNTRACK_LOCKS; i++) spin_lock_init(&nf_nat_locks[i]); nf_ct_helper_expectfn_register(&follow_master_nat); |