diff options
| author | Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> | 2016-08-02 14:02:34 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2016-08-02 17:31:41 -0400 |
| commit | 4e666314d286765a9e61818b488c7372326654ec (patch) | |
| tree | 7a50291e533fcd14a2476212e71afb3feccc49ac /mm | |
| parent | 649920c6ab93429b94bc7c1aa7c0e8395351be32 (diff) | |
mm, hugetlb: fix huge_pte_alloc BUG_ON
Zhong Jiang has reported a BUG_ON from huge_pte_alloc hitting when he
runs his database load with memory online and offline running in
parallel. The reason is that huge_pmd_share might detect a shared pmd
which is currently migrated and so it has migration pte which is
!pte_huge.
There doesn't seem to be any easy way to prevent from the race and in
fact seeing the migration swap entry is not harmful. Both callers of
huge_pte_alloc are prepared to handle them. copy_hugetlb_page_range
will copy the swap entry and make it COW if needed. hugetlb_fault will
back off and so the page fault is retries if the page is still under
migration and waits for its completion in hugetlb_fault.
That means that the BUG_ON is wrong and we should update it. Let's
simply check that all present ptes are pte_huge instead.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160721074340.GA26398@dhcp22.suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reported-by: zhongjiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/hugetlb.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 619e00d82c5d..ef968306fd5b 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -4310,7 +4310,7 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, pte = (pte_t *)pmd_alloc(mm, pud, addr); } } - BUG_ON(pte && !pte_none(*pte) && !pte_huge(*pte)); + BUG_ON(pte && pte_present(*pte) && !pte_huge(*pte)); return pte; } |