summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/vmscan.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>2016-05-20 16:56:34 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2016-05-20 17:58:30 -0700
commitb6459cc154e804f0de0d61fa023c4946b742cc96 (patch)
tree976b4d9357b7ac2e88af171bb5ec9e1b7605dc62 /mm/vmscan.c
parent59dc76b0d4dfdd7dc46a1010e4afb44f60f3e97f (diff)
vmscan: consider classzone_idx in compaction_ready
Motivation: As pointed out by Linus [2][3] relying on zone_reclaimable as a way to communicate the reclaim progress is rater dubious. I tend to agree, not only it is really obscure, it is not hard to imagine cases where a single page freed in the loop keeps all the reclaimers looping without getting any progress because their gfp_mask wouldn't allow to get that page anyway (e.g. single GFP_ATOMIC alloc and free loop). This is rather rare so it doesn't happen in the practice but the current logic which we have is rather obscure and hard to follow a also non-deterministic. This is an attempt to make the OOM detection more deterministic and easier to follow because each reclaimer basically tracks its own progress which is implemented at the page allocator layer rather spread out between the allocator and the reclaim. The more on the implementation is described in the first patch. I have tested several different scenarios but it should be clear that testing OOM killer is quite hard to be representative. There is usually a tiny gap between almost OOM and full blown OOM which is often time sensitive. Anyway, I have tested the following 2 scenarios and I would appreciate if there are more to test. Testing environment: a virtual machine with 2G of RAM and 2CPUs without any swap to make the OOM more deterministic. 1) 2 writers (each doing dd with 4M blocks to an xfs partition with 1G file size, removes the files and starts over again) running in parallel for 10s to build up a lot of dirty pages when 100 parallel mem_eaters (anon private populated mmap which waits until it gets signal) with 80M each. This causes an OOM flood of course and I have compared both patched and unpatched kernels. The test is considered finished after there are no OOM conditions detected. This should tell us whether there are any excessive kills or some of them premature (e.g. due to dirty pages): I have performed two runs this time each after a fresh boot. * base kernel $ grep "Out of memory:" base-oom-run1.log | wc -l 78 $ grep "Out of memory:" base-oom-run2.log | wc -l 78 $ grep "Kill process" base-oom-run1.log | tail -n1 [ 91.391203] Out of memory: Kill process 3061 (mem_eater) score 39 or sacrifice child $ grep "Kill process" base-oom-run2.log | tail -n1 [ 82.141919] Out of memory: Kill process 3086 (mem_eater) score 39 or sacrifice child $ grep "DMA32 free:" base-oom-run1.log | sed 's@.*free:\([0-9]*\)kB.*@\1@' | calc_min_max.awk min: 5376.00 max: 6776.00 avg: 5530.75 std: 166.50 nr: 61 $ grep "DMA32 free:" base-oom-run2.log | sed 's@.*free:\([0-9]*\)kB.*@\1@' | calc_min_max.awk min: 5416.00 max: 5608.00 avg: 5514.15 std: 42.94 nr: 52 $ grep "DMA32.*all_unreclaimable? no" base-oom-run1.log | wc -l 1 $ grep "DMA32.*all_unreclaimable? no" base-oom-run2.log | wc -l 3 * patched kernel $ grep "Out of memory:" patched-oom-run1.log | wc -l 78 miso@tiehlicka /mnt/share/devel/miso/kvm $ grep "Out of memory:" patched-oom-run2.log | wc -l 77 e grep "Kill process" patched-oom-run1.log | tail -n1 [ 497.317732] Out of memory: Kill process 3108 (mem_eater) score 39 or sacrifice child $ grep "Kill process" patched-oom-run2.log | tail -n1 [ 316.169920] Out of memory: Kill process 3093 (mem_eater) score 39 or sacrifice child $ grep "DMA32 free:" patched-oom-run1.log | sed 's@.*free:\([0-9]*\)kB.*@\1@' | calc_min_max.awk min: 5420.00 max: 5808.00 avg: 5513.90 std: 60.45 nr: 78 $ grep "DMA32 free:" patched-oom-run2.log | sed 's@.*free:\([0-9]*\)kB.*@\1@' | calc_min_max.awk min: 5380.00 max: 6384.00 avg: 5520.94 std: 136.84 nr: 77 e grep "DMA32.*all_unreclaimable? no" patched-oom-run1.log | wc -l 2 $ grep "DMA32.*all_unreclaimable? no" patched-oom-run2.log | wc -l 3 The patched kernel run noticeably longer while invoking OOM killer same number of times. This means that the original implementation is much more aggressive and triggers the OOM killer sooner. free pages stats show that neither kernels went OOM too early most of the time, though. I guess the difference is in the backoff when retries without any progress do sleep for a while if there is memory under writeback or dirty which is highly likely considering the parallel IO. Both kernels have seen races where zone wasn't marked unreclaimable and we still hit the OOM killer. This is most likely a race where a task managed to exit between the last allocation attempt and the oom killer invocation. 2) 2 writers again with 10s of run and then 10 mem_eaters to consume as much memory as possible without triggering the OOM killer. This required a lot of tuning but I've considered 3 consecutive runs in three different boots without OOM as a success. * base kernel size=$(awk '/MemFree/{printf "%dK", ($2/10)-(16*1024)}' /proc/meminfo) * patched kernel size=$(awk '/MemFree/{printf "%dK", ($2/10)-(12*1024)}' /proc/meminfo) That means 40M more memory was usable without triggering OOM killer. The base kernel sometimes managed to handle the same as patched but it wasn't consistent and failed in at least on of the 3 runs. This seems like a minor improvement. I was testing also GPF_REPEAT costly requests (hughetlb) with fragmented memory and under memory pressure. The results are in patch 11 where the logic is implemented. In short I can see huge improvement there. I am certainly interested in other usecases as well as well as any feedback. Especially those which require higher order requests. This patch (of 14): While playing with the oom detection rework [1] I have noticed that my heavy order-9 (hugetlb) load close to OOM ended up in an endless loop where the reclaim hasn't made any progress but did_some_progress didn't reflect that and compaction_suitable was backing off because no zone is above low wmark + 1 << order. It turned out that this is in fact an old standing bug in compaction_ready which ignores the requested_highidx and did the watermark check for 0 classzone_idx. This succeeds for zone DMA most of the time as the zone is mostly unused because of lowmem protection. As a result costly high order allocatios always report a successfull progress even when there was none. This wasn't a problem so far because these allocations usually fail quite early or retry only few times with __GFP_REPEAT but this will change after later patch in this series so make sure to not lie about the progress and propagate requested_highidx down to compaction_ready and use it for both the watermak check and compaction_suitable to fix this issue. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459855533-4600-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/12/808 [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/13/597 Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/vmscan.c8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 38d6d06c955f..a386454c015a 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2459,7 +2459,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
* Returns true if compaction should go ahead for a high-order request, or
* the high-order allocation would succeed without compaction.
*/
-static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order)
+static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order, int classzone_idx)
{
unsigned long balance_gap, watermark;
bool watermark_ok;
@@ -2473,7 +2473,7 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order)
balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone), DIV_ROUND_UP(
zone->managed_pages, KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO));
watermark = high_wmark_pages(zone) + balance_gap + (2UL << order);
- watermark_ok = zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, 0, watermark, 0);
+ watermark_ok = zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, 0, watermark, classzone_idx);
/*
* If compaction is deferred, reclaim up to a point where
@@ -2486,7 +2486,7 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order)
* If compaction is not ready to start and allocation is not likely
* to succeed without it, then keep reclaiming.
*/
- if (compaction_suitable(zone, order, 0, 0) == COMPACT_SKIPPED)
+ if (compaction_suitable(zone, order, 0, classzone_idx) == COMPACT_SKIPPED)
return false;
return watermark_ok;
@@ -2566,7 +2566,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) &&
sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= requested_highidx &&
- compaction_ready(zone, sc->order)) {
+ compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, requested_highidx)) {
sc->compaction_ready = true;
continue;
}