summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/vsprintf.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDon Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>2011-03-22 16:34:17 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2011-03-22 17:44:12 -0700
commitf99a99330f85a84c346ddeb4adc72dbfad9b9e3e (patch)
tree4c72a3f2231e7c79f1afeaee5cd03ae7331d3b7a /lib/vsprintf.c
parentfef2c9bc1b54c0261324a96e948c0b849796e896 (diff)
kernel/watchdog.c: always return NOTIFY_OK during cpu up/down events
This patch addresses a couple of problems. One was the case when the hardlockup failed to start, it also failed to start the softlockup. There were valid cases when the hardlockup shouldn't start and that shouldn't block the softlockup (no lapic, bios controls perf counters). The second problem was when the hardlockup failed to start on boxes (from a no lapic or bios controlled perf counter case), it reported failure to the cpu notifier chain. This blocked the notifier from continuing to start other more critical pieces of cpu bring-up (in our case based on a 2.6.32 fork, it was the mce). As a result, during soft cpu online/offline testing, the system would panic when a cpu was offlined because the cpu notifier would succeed in processing a watchdog disable cpu event and would panic in the mce case as a result of un-initialized variables from a never executed cpu up event. I realized the hardlockup/softlockup cases are really just debugging aids and should never impede the progress of a cpu up/down event. Therefore I modified the code to always return NOTIFY_OK and instead rely on printks to inform the user of problems. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Reviewed-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/vsprintf.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions