diff options
| author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2018-04-30 14:50:22 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2018-05-03 07:38:04 +0200 |
| commit | 741a76b350897604c48fb12beff1c9b77724dc96 (patch) | |
| tree | 2f2a010fb227f8c14853ab8bd5e17697d92054db /kernel | |
| parent | 457be908c83637ee10bda085a23dc05afa3b14a0 (diff) | |
kthread, sched/wait: Fix kthread_parkme() wait-loop
Gaurav reported a problem with __kthread_parkme() where a concurrent
try_to_wake_up() could result in competing stores to ->state which,
when the TASK_PARKED store got lost bad things would happen.
The comment near set_current_state() actually mentions this competing
store, but only mentions the case against TASK_RUNNING. This same
store, with different timing, can happen against a subsequent !RUNNING
store.
This normally is not a problem, because as per that same comment, the
!RUNNING state store is inside a condition based wait-loop:
for (;;) {
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
if (!need_sleep)
break;
schedule();
}
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
If we loose the (first) TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE store to a previous
(concurrent) wakeup, the schedule() will NO-OP and we'll go around the
loop once more.
The problem here is that the TASK_PARKED store is not inside the
KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK condition wait-loop.
There is a genuine issue with sleeps that do not have a condition;
this is addressed in a subsequent patch.
Reported-by: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/kthread.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c index cd50e99202b0..cbee858e5815 100644 --- a/kernel/kthread.c +++ b/kernel/kthread.c @@ -177,12 +177,13 @@ void *kthread_probe_data(struct task_struct *task) static void __kthread_parkme(struct kthread *self) { - __set_current_state(TASK_PARKED); - while (test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &self->flags)) { + for (;;) { + set_current_state(TASK_PARKED); + if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &self->flags)) + break; if (!test_and_set_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &self->flags)) complete(&self->parked); schedule(); - __set_current_state(TASK_PARKED); } clear_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &self->flags); __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); |