summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>2020-09-17 15:44:53 +0800
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2020-09-21 21:20:17 +0200
commit31f23a6a181c81543b10a1a9056b0e6c7ef1c747 (patch)
treee275566fe13c8fdd63f4b6206173f2e9692a5844 /kernel
parent70b971118e074d5042715587953f27929e99117a (diff)
bpf: Fix potential call bpf_link_free() in atomic context
The in_atomic() macro cannot always detect atomic context, in particular, it cannot know about held spinlocks in non-preemptible kernels. Although, there is no user call bpf_link_put() with holding spinlock now, be on the safe side, so we can avoid this in the future. Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200917074453.20621-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/syscall.c8
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 2ce32cad5c8e..ec68d3a23a2b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2345,12 +2345,8 @@ void bpf_link_put(struct bpf_link *link)
if (!atomic64_dec_and_test(&link->refcnt))
return;
- if (in_atomic()) {
- INIT_WORK(&link->work, bpf_link_put_deferred);
- schedule_work(&link->work);
- } else {
- bpf_link_free(link);
- }
+ INIT_WORK(&link->work, bpf_link_put_deferred);
+ schedule_work(&link->work);
}
static int bpf_link_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)