summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/time
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2018-03-15 23:05:50 +0100
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2018-04-05 19:01:14 +0200
commit2aaf709a518d26563b80fd7a42379d7aa7ffed4a (patch)
treef58fc91024e9511ffed664ba51dc2f246e09ad1e /kernel/time
parent0e7767687fdabfc58d5046e7488632bf2ecd4d0c (diff)
sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop
Push the decision whether or not to stop the tick somewhat deeper into the idle loop. Stopping the tick upfront leads to unpleasant outcomes in case the idle governor doesn't agree with the nohz code on the duration of the upcoming idle period. Specifically, if the tick has been stopped and the idle governor predicts short idle, the situation is bad regardless of whether or not the prediction is accurate. If it is accurate, the tick has been stopped unnecessarily which means excessive overhead. If it is not accurate, the CPU is likely to spend too much time in the (shallow, because short idle has been predicted) idle state selected by the governor [1]. As the first step towards addressing this problem, change the code to make the tick stopping decision inside of the loop in do_idle(). In particular, do not stop the tick in the cpu_idle_poll() code path. Also don't do that in tick_nohz_irq_exit() which doesn't really have enough information on whether or not to stop the tick. Link: https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=150116085925208&w=2 # [1] Link: https://tu-dresden.de/zih/forschung/ressourcen/dateien/projekte/haec/powernightmares.pdf Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/time')
-rw-r--r--kernel/time/tick-sched.c26
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 678349aec483..f5d37788ea85 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -960,12 +960,10 @@ void tick_nohz_irq_exit(void)
{
struct tick_sched *ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
- if (ts->inidle) {
+ if (ts->inidle)
tick_nohz_start_idle(ts);
- __tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(ts);
- } else {
+ else
tick_nohz_full_update_tick(ts);
- }
}
/**
@@ -1026,6 +1024,20 @@ static void tick_nohz_account_idle_ticks(struct tick_sched *ts)
#endif
}
+static void __tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
+{
+ tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(ts, now);
+ tick_nohz_account_idle_ticks(ts);
+}
+
+void tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick(void)
+{
+ struct tick_sched *ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
+
+ if (ts->tick_stopped)
+ __tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick(ts, ktime_get());
+}
+
/**
* tick_nohz_idle_exit - restart the idle tick from the idle task
*
@@ -1050,10 +1062,8 @@ void tick_nohz_idle_exit(void)
if (ts->idle_active)
tick_nohz_stop_idle(ts, now);
- if (ts->tick_stopped) {
- tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(ts, now);
- tick_nohz_account_idle_ticks(ts);
- }
+ if (ts->tick_stopped)
+ __tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick(ts, now);
local_irq_enable();
}