diff options
author | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2015-03-25 13:09:16 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2015-04-01 14:22:59 +0200 |
commit | 4ffee521f36390c7720d493591b764ca35c8030b (patch) | |
tree | 9836af97487f83a0680c293f187cd116875ec2c5 /kernel/time/timekeeping.c | |
parent | db6f672ef11d7a3c5aa128a3c3e57c92580a25f7 (diff) |
clockevents: Make suspend/resume calls explicit
clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call.
We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this
monstrosity. Split out the suspend/resume() calls and invoke
them directly from the call sites.
No locking required at this point because these calls happen
with interrupts disabled and a single cpu online.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5. ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/713674030.jVm1qaHuPf@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Rebased on top of latest timers/core. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/time/timekeeping.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index c3fcff06d30a..5b12292b343a 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -1389,9 +1389,7 @@ void timekeeping_resume(void) touch_softlockup_watchdog(); - clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_RESUME, NULL); - - /* Resume hrtimers */ + tick_resume(); hrtimers_resume(); } @@ -1444,7 +1442,7 @@ int timekeeping_suspend(void) write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags); - clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_SUSPEND, NULL); + tick_suspend(); clocksource_suspend(); clockevents_suspend(); |