diff options
author | Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> | 2011-12-15 14:36:07 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2011-12-21 10:34:51 +0100 |
commit | 7ceff013c43c0f38f0d26c79507889c6791c0ea0 (patch) | |
tree | f4e164fcb0b75b3d559e644d41fd4c6c29990bef /kernel/sched | |
parent | 4fc420c91f53e0a9f95665c6b14a1983716081e7 (diff) |
sched: Fix cgroup movement of newly created process
There is a small race between do_fork() and sched_move_task(), which is
trying to move the child.
do_fork() sched_move_task()
--------------------------------+---------------------------------
copy_process()
sched_fork()
task_fork_fair()
-> vruntime of the child is initialized
based on that of the parent.
-> we can see the child in "tasks" file now.
task_rq_lock()
task_move_group_fair()
-> child.se.vruntime
-= (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime
+= (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime
task_rq_unlock()
wake_up_new_task()
...
enqueue_entity()
child.se.vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime
As a result, vruntime of the child becomes far bigger than min_vruntime,
if (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime >> (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime.
This patch fixes this problem by just ignoring such process in
task_move_group_fair(), because the vruntime has already been normalized in
task_fork_fair().
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111215143607.2ee12c5d.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 525d69e5fb78..2d1ac6e2386d 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5338,6 +5338,19 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq) * to another cgroup's rq. This does somewhat interfere with the * fair sleeper stuff for the first placement, but who cares. */ + /* + * When !on_rq, vruntime of the task has usually NOT been normalized. + * But there are some cases where it has already been normalized: + * + * - Moving a forked child which is waiting for being woken up by + * wake_up_new_task(). + * + * To prevent boost or penalty in the new cfs_rq caused by delta + * min_vruntime between the two cfs_rqs, we skip vruntime adjustment. + */ + if (!on_rq && !p->se.sum_exec_runtime) + on_rq = 1; + if (!on_rq) p->se.vruntime -= cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime; set_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p)); |