diff options
| author | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> | 2015-02-22 19:31:41 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2015-02-24 08:44:16 +0100 |
| commit | 4d3199e4ca8e6670b54dc5ee070ffd54385988e9 (patch) | |
| tree | 5529bcb16c3217c02416e0d17d7c28f277c63581 /kernel/locking/osq_lock.c | |
| parent | 2ae79026818e7d49fead82b79b1a543e3b9c8a23 (diff) | |
locking: Remove ACCESS_ONCE() usage
With the new standardized functions, we can replace all
ACCESS_ONCE() calls across relevant locking - this includes
lockref and seqlock while at it.
ACCESS_ONCE() does not work reliably on non-scalar types.
For example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag
for such accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of
aggregates) step:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145
Update the new calls regardless of if it is a scalar type,
this is cleaner than having three alternatives.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1424662301.6539.18.camel@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking/osq_lock.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/osq_lock.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c index c112d00341b0..dc85ee23a26f 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock) prev = decode_cpu(old); node->prev = prev; - ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node; + WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node); /* * Normally @prev is untouchable after the above store; because at that @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock) * cmpxchg in an attempt to undo our queueing. */ - while (!ACCESS_ONCE(node->locked)) { + while (!READ_ONCE(node->locked)) { /* * If we need to reschedule bail... so we can block. */ @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ unqueue: * Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which * case its step-C will write us a new @node->prev pointer. */ - prev = ACCESS_ONCE(node->prev); + prev = READ_ONCE(node->prev); } /* @@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ unqueue: * it will wait in Step-A. */ - ACCESS_ONCE(next->prev) = prev; - ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = next; + WRITE_ONCE(next->prev, prev); + WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, next); return false; } @@ -193,11 +193,11 @@ void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock) node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node); next = xchg(&node->next, NULL); if (next) { - ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1; + WRITE_ONCE(next->locked, 1); return; } next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, NULL); if (next) - ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1; + WRITE_ONCE(next->locked, 1); } |