lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks

Extend lockdep to validate lock wait-type context.

The current wait-types are:

	LD_WAIT_FREE,		/* wait free, rcu etc.. */
	LD_WAIT_SPIN,		/* spin loops, raw_spinlock_t etc.. */
	LD_WAIT_CONFIG,		/* CONFIG_PREEMPT_LOCK, spinlock_t etc.. */
	LD_WAIT_SLEEP,		/* sleeping locks, mutex_t etc.. */

Where lockdep validates that the current lock (the one being acquired)
fits in the current wait-context (as generated by the held stack).

This ensures that there is no attempt to acquire mutexes while holding
spinlocks, to acquire spinlocks while holding raw_spinlocks and so on. In
other words, its a more fancy might_sleep().

Obviously RCU made the entire ordeal more complex than a simple single
value test because RCU can be acquired in (pretty much) any context and
while it presents a context to nested locks it is not the same as it
got acquired in.

Therefore its necessary to split the wait_type into two values, one
representing the acquire (outer) and one representing the nested context
(inner). For most 'normal' locks these two are the same.

[ To make static initialization easier we have the rule that:
  .outer == INV means .outer == .inner; because INV == 0. ]

It further means that its required to find the minimal .inner of the held
stack to compare against the outer of the new lock; because while 'normal'
RCU presents a CONFIG type to nested locks, if it is taken while already
holding a SPIN type it obviously doesn't relax the rules.

Below is an example output generated by the trivial test code:

  raw_spin_lock(&foo);
  spin_lock(&bar);
  spin_unlock(&bar);
  raw_spin_unlock(&foo);

 [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
 -----------------------------
 swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
 ffffc90000013f20 (&bar){....}-{3:3}, at: kernel_init+0xdb/0x187
 other info that might help us debug this:
 1 lock held by swapper/0/1:
  #0: ffffc90000013ee0 (&foo){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: kernel_init+0xd1/0x187

The way to read it is to look at the new -{n,m} part in the lock
description; -{3:3} for the attempted lock, and try and match that up to
the held locks, which in this case is the one: -{2,2}.

This tells that the acquiring lock requires a more relaxed environment than
presented by the lock stack.

Currently only the normal locks and RCU are converted, the rest of the
lockdep users defaults to .inner = INV which is ignored. More conversions
can be done when desired.

The check for spinlock_t nesting is not enabled by default. It's a separate
config option for now as there are known problems which are currently
addressed. The config option allows to identify these problems and to
verify that the solutions found are indeed solving them.

The config switch will be removed and the checks will permanently enabled
once the vast majority of issues has been addressed.

[ bigeasy: Move LD_WAIT_FREE,… out of CONFIG_LOCKDEP to avoid compile
	   failure with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK + !CONFIG_LOCKDEP]
[ tglx: Add the config option ]

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321113242.427089655@linutronix.de

1 files changed, 132 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 4c3b1ccc6c2d..6b9f9f321e6d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -683,7 +683,9 @@ static void print_lock_name(struct lock_class *class)
 
 	printk(KERN_CONT " (");
 	__print_lock_name(class);
-	printk(KERN_CONT "){%s}", usage);
+	printk(KERN_CONT "){%s}-{%hd:%hd}", usage,
+			class->wait_type_outer ?: class->wait_type_inner,
+			class->wait_type_inner);
 }
 
 static void print_lockdep_cache(struct lockdep_map *lock)
@@ -1264,6 +1266,8 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&class->locks_before));
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&class->locks_after));
 	class->name_version = count_matching_names(class);
+	class->wait_type_inner = lock->wait_type_inner;
+	class->wait_type_outer = lock->wait_type_outer;
 	/*
 	 * We use RCU's safe list-add method to make
 	 * parallel walking of the hash-list safe:
@@ -3948,6 +3952,113 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int
+print_lock_invalid_wait_context(struct task_struct *curr,
+				struct held_lock *hlock)
+{
+	if (!debug_locks_off())
+		return 0;
+	if (debug_locks_silent)
+		return 0;
+
+	pr_warn("\n");
+	pr_warn("=============================\n");
+	pr_warn("[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]\n");
+	print_kernel_ident();
+	pr_warn("-----------------------------\n");
+
+	pr_warn("%s/%d is trying to lock:\n", curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
+	print_lock(hlock);
+
+	pr_warn("other info that might help us debug this:\n");
+	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
+
+	pr_warn("stack backtrace:\n");
+	dump_stack();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Verify the wait_type context.
+ *
+ * This check validates we takes locks in the right wait-type order; that is it
+ * ensures that we do not take mutexes inside spinlocks and do not attempt to
+ * acquire spinlocks inside raw_spinlocks and the sort.
+ *
+ * The entire thing is slightly more complex because of RCU, RCU is a lock that
+ * can be taken from (pretty much) any context but also has constraints.
+ * However when taken in a stricter environment the RCU lock does not loosen
+ * the constraints.
+ *
+ * Therefore we must look for the strictest environment in the lock stack and
+ * compare that to the lock we're trying to acquire.
+ */
+static int check_wait_context(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
+{
+	short next_inner = hlock_class(next)->wait_type_inner;
+	short next_outer = hlock_class(next)->wait_type_outer;
+	short curr_inner;
+	int depth;
+
+	if (!curr->lockdep_depth || !next_inner || next->trylock)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!next_outer)
+		next_outer = next_inner;
+
+	/*
+	 * Find start of current irq_context..
+	 */
+	for (depth = curr->lockdep_depth - 1; depth >= 0; depth--) {
+		struct held_lock *prev = curr->held_locks + depth;
+		if (prev->irq_context != next->irq_context)
+			break;
+	}
+	depth++;
+
+	/*
+	 * Set appropriate wait type for the context; for IRQs we have to take
+	 * into account force_irqthread as that is implied by PREEMPT_RT.
+	 */
+	if (curr->hardirq_context) {
+		/*
+		 * Check if force_irqthreads will run us threaded.
+		 */
+		if (curr->hardirq_threaded)
+			curr_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG;
+		else
+			curr_inner = LD_WAIT_SPIN;
+	} else if (curr->softirq_context) {
+		/*
+		 * Softirqs are always threaded.
+		 */
+		curr_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG;
+	} else {
+		curr_inner = LD_WAIT_MAX;
+	}
+
+	for (; depth < curr->lockdep_depth; depth++) {
+		struct held_lock *prev = curr->held_locks + depth;
+		short prev_inner = hlock_class(prev)->wait_type_inner;
+
+		if (prev_inner) {
+			/*
+			 * We can have a bigger inner than a previous one
+			 * when outer is smaller than inner, as with RCU.
+			 *
+			 * Also due to trylocks.
+			 */
+			curr_inner = min(curr_inner, prev_inner);
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (next_outer > curr_inner)
+		return print_lock_invalid_wait_context(curr, next);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #else /* CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
 
 static inline int
@@ -3967,13 +4078,20 @@ static inline int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline int check_wait_context(struct task_struct *curr,
+				     struct held_lock *next)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
 
 /*
  * Initialize a lock instance's lock-class mapping info:
  */
-void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
-		      struct lock_class_key *key, int subclass)
+void lockdep_init_map_waits(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
+			    struct lock_class_key *key, int subclass,
+			    short inner, short outer)
 {
 	int i;
 
@@ -3994,6 +4112,9 @@ void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 
 	lock->name = name;
 
+	lock->wait_type_outer = outer;
+	lock->wait_type_inner = inner;
+
 	/*
 	 * No key, no joy, we need to hash something.
 	 */
@@ -4027,7 +4148,7 @@ void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 		raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 	}
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_init_map);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_init_map_waits);
 
 struct lock_class_key __lockdep_no_validate__;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__lockdep_no_validate__);
@@ -4128,7 +4249,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 
 	class_idx = class - lock_classes;
 
-	if (depth) {
+	if (depth) { /* we're holding locks */
 		hlock = curr->held_locks + depth - 1;
 		if (hlock->class_idx == class_idx && nest_lock) {
 			if (!references)
@@ -4170,6 +4291,9 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 #endif
 	hlock->pin_count = pin_count;
 
+	if (check_wait_context(curr, hlock))
+		return 0;
+
 	/* Initialize the lock usage bit */
 	if (!mark_usage(curr, hlock, check))
 		return 0;
@@ -4405,7 +4529,9 @@ __lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	lockdep_init_map(lock, name, key, 0);
+	lockdep_init_map_waits(lock, name, key, 0,
+			       lock->wait_type_inner,
+			       lock->wait_type_outer);
 	class = register_lock_class(lock, subclass, 0);
 	hlock->class_idx = class - lock_classes;