summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/init
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>2016-03-25 13:25:50 -0400
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2016-07-07 18:45:53 +0200
commitc48f49d63dfea12c0173fb2e99db1308f39c23ae (patch)
tree928ece07ce25e6c771f97de68fe2f7bdd091716a /init
parent48c3d480e4f746edb0bd3b84b4bd987ef8728560 (diff)
Btrfs: change delayed reservation fallback behavior
We reserve space for the inode update when we first reserve space for writing to a file. However there are lots of ways that we can use this reservation and not have it for subsequent ordered extents. Previously we'd fall through and try to reserve metadata bytes for this, then we'd just steal the full reservation from the delalloc_block_rsv, and if that didn't have enough space we'd steal the full reservation from the global reserve. The problem with this is we can easily just return ENOSPC and fallback to updating the inode item directly. In the worst case (assuming 4k nodesize) we'd steal 64kib from the global reserve if we fall all the way through, however if we just fallback and update the inode directly we'd only steal 4k * BTRFS_PATH_MAX in the worst case which is 32kib. We would have also just added the extent item for the inode so we likely will have already cow'ed down most of the way to the leaf containing the inode item, so we are more often than not only need one or two nodesize's worth of reservations. Given the reservation for the extent itself is also a worst case we will likely already have space to cover the inode update. This change will make us behave better in the theoretical worst case, and much better in the case that we don't have our reservation and cannot reserve more metadata. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'init')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions