diff options
| author | Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> | 2017-06-08 08:23:07 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> | 2017-06-08 08:23:07 -0700 |
| commit | 95989c46d2a156365867b1d795fdefce71bce378 (patch) | |
| tree | 300e849efbeefc8e35c4bf195a107c1002aca73d /fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | |
| parent | 63db7c815bc0997c29e484d2409684fdd9fcd93b (diff) | |
xfs: fix spurious spin_is_locked() assert failures on non-smp kernels
The 0-day kernel test robot reports assertion failures on
!CONFIG_SMP kernels due to failed spin_is_locked() checks. As it
turns out, spin_is_locked() is hardcoded to return zero on
!CONFIG_SMP kernels and so this function cannot be relied on to
verify spinlock state in this configuration.
To avoid this problem, replace the associated asserts with lockdep
variants that do the right thing regardless of kernel configuration.
Drop the one assert that checks for an unlocked lock as there is no
suitable lockdep variant for that case. This moves the spinlock
checks from XFS debug code to lockdep, but generally provides the
same level of protection.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c index 07b77b73b024..16d6a578fc16 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline void __xfs_buf_ioacct_dec( struct xfs_buf *bp) { - ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&bp->b_lock)); + lockdep_assert_held(&bp->b_lock); if (bp->b_state & XFS_BSTATE_IN_FLIGHT) { bp->b_state &= ~XFS_BSTATE_IN_FLIGHT; |