diff options
author | Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> | 2019-03-27 14:24:12 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> | 2019-04-29 19:02:37 +0200 |
commit | 1c11b63eff2a67906cb9137bc6b2ee27767f313b (patch) | |
tree | b68008df55c8d10a68832dacd19fa0f254b86f09 /fs/btrfs/transaction.c | |
parent | 68c94e55e1502868813a3cac2febc021d01edb75 (diff) |
btrfs: replace pending/pinned chunks lists with io tree
The pending chunks list contains chunks that are allocated in the
current transaction but haven't been created yet. The pinned chunks
list contains chunks that are being released in the current transaction.
Both describe chunks that are not reflected on disk as in use but are
unavailable just the same.
The pending chunks list is anchored by the transaction handle, which
means that we need to hold a reference to a transaction when working
with the list.
The way we use them is by iterating over both lists to perform
comparisons on the stripes they describe for each device. This is
backwards and requires that we keep a transaction handle open while
we're trimming.
This patchset adds an extent_io_tree to btrfs_device that maintains
the allocation state of the device. Extents are set dirty when
chunks are first allocated -- when the extent maps are added to the
mapping tree. They're cleared when last removed -- when the extent
maps are removed from the mapping tree. This matches the lifespan
of the pending and pinned chunks list and allows us to do trims
on unallocated space safely without pinning the transaction for what
may be a lengthy operation. We can also use this io tree to mark
which chunks have already been trimmed so we don't repeat the operation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/transaction.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c index b32769998bbb..e5404326fc55 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c @@ -50,14 +50,6 @@ void btrfs_put_transaction(struct btrfs_transaction *transaction) btrfs_err(transaction->fs_info, "pending csums is %llu", transaction->delayed_refs.pending_csums); - while (!list_empty(&transaction->pending_chunks)) { - struct extent_map *em; - - em = list_first_entry(&transaction->pending_chunks, - struct extent_map, list); - list_del_init(&em->list); - free_extent_map(em); - } /* * If any block groups are found in ->deleted_bgs then it's * because the transaction was aborted and a commit did not @@ -235,7 +227,6 @@ loop: spin_lock_init(&cur_trans->delayed_refs.lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cur_trans->pending_snapshots); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cur_trans->pending_chunks); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cur_trans->dev_update_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cur_trans->switch_commits); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs); |