summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>2020-08-20 11:46:00 -0400
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2020-10-07 12:12:15 +0200
commit329ced799be881feab445b68163cd3869340cc08 (patch)
treeed5c08b39452dae302db27ad6c662fb9c94d8188 /fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
parentb9ba017fb0771f67903d70f57908899d7b0020b1 (diff)
btrfs: rename extent_buffer::lock_nested to extent_buffer::lock_recursed
Nested locking with lockdep and everything else refers to lock hierarchy within the same lock map. This is how we indicate the same locks for different objects are ok to take in a specific order, for our use case that would be to take the lock on a leaf and then take a lock on an adjacent leaf. What ->lock_nested _actually_ refers to is if we happen to already be holding the write lock on the extent buffer and we're allowing a read lock to be taken on that extent buffer, which is recursion. Rename this so we don't get confused when we switch to a rwsem and have to start using the _nested helpers. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/extent_io.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/extent_io.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index a28d442d65b5..f971e9d689df 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -4990,7 +4990,7 @@ __alloc_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 start,
rwlock_init(&eb->lock);
atomic_set(&eb->blocking_readers, 0);
eb->blocking_writers = 0;
- eb->lock_nested = false;
+ eb->lock_recursed = false;
init_waitqueue_head(&eb->write_lock_wq);
init_waitqueue_head(&eb->read_lock_wq);