summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>2017-07-11 13:47:50 +0300
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2017-08-16 16:12:02 +0200
commit1174cade8182b4136c8a162342bf7e8eba7200de (patch)
treebe3437981ce24581b19c87355a410926f9882785 /fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
parent7bdd6277e0dc2beb4f5db5ea4ff7670ecf0b5879 (diff)
btrfs: Remove redundant checks from btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand
Many commits ago the data space_info in alloc_data_chunk_ondemand used to be acquired from the inode. At that point commit 33b4d47f5e24 ("Btrfs: deal with NULL space info") got introduced to deal with spurios cases where the space info could be null, following a rebalance. Nowadays, however, the space info is referenced directly from the btrfs_fs_info struct which is initialised at filesystem mount time. This makes the null checks redundant, so remove them. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c11
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 288b38ae8791..4fe93c436302 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4199,9 +4199,9 @@ static u64 btrfs_space_info_used(struct btrfs_space_info *s_info,
int btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 bytes)
{
- struct btrfs_space_info *data_sinfo;
struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
+ struct btrfs_space_info *data_sinfo = fs_info->data_sinfo;
u64 used;
int ret = 0;
int need_commit = 2;
@@ -4215,10 +4215,6 @@ int btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 bytes)
ASSERT(current->journal_info);
}
- data_sinfo = fs_info->data_sinfo;
- if (!data_sinfo)
- goto alloc;
-
again:
/* make sure we have enough space to handle the data first */
spin_lock(&data_sinfo->lock);
@@ -4236,7 +4232,7 @@ again:
data_sinfo->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE;
spin_unlock(&data_sinfo->lock);
-alloc:
+
alloc_target = btrfs_data_alloc_profile(fs_info);
/*
* It is ugly that we don't call nolock join
@@ -4264,9 +4260,6 @@ alloc:
}
}
- if (!data_sinfo)
- data_sinfo = fs_info->data_sinfo;
-
goto again;
}