summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/video
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2007-03-01 18:29:14 -0800
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@sunset.davemloft.net>2007-03-02 15:22:54 -0800
commit7ab876703dcbe852652db6441f0aadb3d6b75e94 (patch)
tree4c9f04c21962c5d6a265a4ae0adf19110ea3633e /drivers/video
parentc4c31fe0e2298529afa1357ebd9dad54b44c4e19 (diff)
[RADEON]: Fix blanking return value.
If you'll recall, over a year ago, I pointed out that the current Radeon driver erroneously returns -EINVAL for valid blanking codes, here is a link to that thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/28/6 No other driver does this, and it confuses the X server into thinking that the device does not support blanking properly. I looked again and there is simply no reason for the Radeon driver to return -EINVAL for FB_BLANK_NORMAL. It claims it wants to do this in order to convince fbcon to blank in software, right here: if (fb_blank(info, blank)) fbcon_generic_blank(vc, info, blank); to software blank the screen. But it only causes that to happen in the FB_BLANK_NORMAL case. That makes no sense because the Radeon code does this: val |= CRTC_DISPLAY_DIS; in the FB_BLANK_NORMAL case so should be blanking the hardware, and there is therefore no reason to SW blank by returning -EINVAL. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/video')
-rw-r--r--drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c3
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c b/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c
index 7e228aded4c2..46ba1235f03a 100644
--- a/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c
+++ b/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c
@@ -1026,8 +1026,7 @@ int radeon_screen_blank(struct radeonfb_info *rinfo, int blank, int mode_switch)
break;
}
- /* let fbcon do a soft blank for us */
- return (blank == FB_BLANK_NORMAL) ? -EINVAL : 0;
+ return 0;
}
static int radeonfb_blank (int blank, struct fb_info *info)