summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/bonding
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2019-12-22 15:15:05 -0800
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2019-12-22 15:15:05 -0800
commitac80010fc94eb0680d9a432b639583bd7ac29066 (patch)
tree2de924c048910abfbfff52a3d5188a790ead379f /drivers/net/bonding
parentcfeec3fb5451c2edd0569c0c245868612a417e5f (diff)
parentc60174717544aa8959683d7e19d568309c3a0c65 (diff)
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
Mere overlapping changes in the conflicts here. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/bonding')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c42
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index fcb7c2f7f001..48d5ec770b94 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2272,9 +2272,6 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
} else if (BOND_MODE(bond) != BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
/* make it immediately active */
bond_set_active_slave(slave);
- } else if (slave != primary) {
- /* prevent it from being the active one */
- bond_set_backup_slave(slave);
}
slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status definitely up, %u Mbps %s duplex\n",
@@ -3702,32 +3699,35 @@ static int bond_neigh_init(struct neighbour *n)
const struct net_device_ops *slave_ops;
struct neigh_parms parms;
struct slave *slave;
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
- slave = bond_first_slave(bond);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ slave = bond_first_slave_rcu(bond);
if (!slave)
- return 0;
+ goto out;
slave_ops = slave->dev->netdev_ops;
if (!slave_ops->ndo_neigh_setup)
- return 0;
-
- parms.neigh_setup = NULL;
- parms.neigh_cleanup = NULL;
- ret = slave_ops->ndo_neigh_setup(slave->dev, &parms);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto out;
- /* Assign slave's neigh_cleanup to neighbour in case cleanup is called
- * after the last slave has been detached. Assumes that all slaves
- * utilize the same neigh_cleanup (true at this writing as only user
- * is ipoib).
+ /* TODO: find another way [1] to implement this.
+ * Passing a zeroed structure is fragile,
+ * but at least we do not pass garbage.
+ *
+ * [1] One way would be that ndo_neigh_setup() never touch
+ * struct neigh_parms, but propagate the new neigh_setup()
+ * back to ___neigh_create() / neigh_parms_alloc()
*/
- n->parms->neigh_cleanup = parms.neigh_cleanup;
+ memset(&parms, 0, sizeof(parms));
+ ret = slave_ops->ndo_neigh_setup(slave->dev, &parms);
- if (!parms.neigh_setup)
- return 0;
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
- return parms.neigh_setup(n);
+ if (parms.neigh_setup)
+ ret = parms.neigh_setup(n);
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return ret;
}
/* The bonding ndo_neigh_setup is called at init time beofre any