diff options
| author | Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com> | 2008-07-29 22:34:14 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2008-07-30 09:41:50 -0700 |
| commit | ea57f80c8c0e59cfc5095f7e856ce7c8e6ac2984 (patch) | |
| tree | f88345573a36c1c5c53e71f61c2cb491a1e3eaaf /drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c | |
| parent | 8e85c23ef04fe0d8414e0b1dc04543095282a27a (diff) | |
sgi-xp: eliminate '>>>' in comments
Comments in /drivers/misc/sgi-xp has been using '>>>' as a means to draw
attention to something that needs to be done or considered. To avoid
colliding with git rejects, '>>>' will now be replaced by '!!!' to
indicate something to do, and by '???' to indicate something to be
considered.
Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c index 63fe59a5bfac..e42c3038203c 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c +++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ xpc_allow_IPI_ops_sn2(void) int node; int nasid; - /* >>> The following should get moved into SAL. */ + /* !!! The following should get moved into SAL. */ if (is_shub2()) { xpc_sh2_IPI_access0_sn2 = (u64)HUB_L((u64 *)LOCAL_MMR_ADDR(SH2_IPI_ACCESS0)); @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ xpc_disallow_IPI_ops_sn2(void) int node; int nasid; - /* >>> The following should get moved into SAL. */ + /* !!! The following should get moved into SAL. */ if (is_shub2()) { for_each_online_node(node) { nasid = cnodeid_to_nasid(node); @@ -1360,7 +1360,7 @@ xpc_teardown_infrastructure_sn2(struct xpc_partition *part) * dst must be a cacheline aligned virtual address on this partition. * cnt must be cacheline sized */ -/* >>> Replace this function by call to xp_remote_memcpy() or bte_copy()? */ +/* ??? Replace this function by call to xp_remote_memcpy() or bte_copy()? */ static enum xp_retval xpc_pull_remote_cachelines_sn2(struct xpc_partition *part, void *dst, const void *src, size_t cnt) @@ -2242,7 +2242,7 @@ xpc_send_msg_sn2(struct xpc_channel *ch, u32 flags, void *payload, notify->key = key; notify->type = notify_type; - /* >>> is a mb() needed here? */ + /* ??? Is a mb() needed here? */ if (ch->flags & XPC_C_DISCONNECTING) { /* |