summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>2020-04-29 12:30:03 -0400
committerMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>2020-05-15 10:29:36 -0400
commit48338daaa00e6137a43fa5d0e54b763aa34f450b (patch)
tree8a3b7250121a73df9de065be338d582f192c9632 /drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
parent499c18045eab16656ef4159c35b05865038f9f25 (diff)
dm writecache: improve performance on DDR persistent memory (Optane)
When testing the dm-writecache target on a real DDR persistent memory (Intel Optane), it turned out that explicit cache flushing using the clflushopt instruction performs better than non-temporal stores for block sizes 1k, 2k and 4k. The dm-writecache target is singlethreaded (all the copying is done while holding the writecache lock), so it benefits from clwb, see: http://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.LRH.2.02.2004160411460.7833@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com Add a new function memcpy_flushcache_optimized() that tests if clflushopt is present - and if it is, we use it instead of memcpy_flushcache. Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/md/dm-writecache.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/md/dm-writecache.c38
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
index d29d3e234e01..74f3c506f084 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
@@ -1139,6 +1139,42 @@ static int writecache_message(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv,
return r;
}
+static void memcpy_flushcache_optimized(void *dest, void *source, size_t size)
+{
+ /*
+ * clflushopt performs better with block size 1024, 2048, 4096
+ * non-temporal stores perform better with block size 512
+ *
+ * block size 512 1024 2048 4096
+ * movnti 496 MB/s 642 MB/s 725 MB/s 744 MB/s
+ * clflushopt 373 MB/s 688 MB/s 1.1 GB/s 1.2 GB/s
+ *
+ * We see that movnti performs better for 512-byte blocks, and
+ * clflushopt performs better for 1024-byte and larger blocks. So, we
+ * prefer clflushopt for sizes >= 768.
+ *
+ * NOTE: this happens to be the case now (with dm-writecache's single
+ * threaded model) but re-evaluate this once memcpy_flushcache() is
+ * enabled to use movdir64b which might invalidate this performance
+ * advantage seen with cache-allocating-writes plus flushing.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+ if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSHOPT) &&
+ likely(boot_cpu_data.x86_clflush_size == 64) &&
+ likely(size >= 768)) {
+ do {
+ memcpy((void *)dest, (void *)source, 64);
+ clflushopt((void *)dest);
+ dest += 64;
+ source += 64;
+ size -= 64;
+ } while (size >= 64);
+ return;
+ }
+#endif
+ memcpy_flushcache(dest, source, size);
+}
+
static void bio_copy_block(struct dm_writecache *wc, struct bio *bio, void *data)
{
void *buf;
@@ -1164,7 +1200,7 @@ static void bio_copy_block(struct dm_writecache *wc, struct bio *bio, void *data
}
} else {
flush_dcache_page(bio_page(bio));
- memcpy_flushcache(data, buf, size);
+ memcpy_flushcache_optimized(data, buf, size);
}
bvec_kunmap_irq(buf, &flags);