summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>2016-04-12 15:51:55 +0200
committerJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>2016-04-18 12:35:50 +0300
commit537d3b10086ffae30efbc7c66777c0a08b58d3e6 (patch)
tree702d96c2d45b4fde270e6512721ad368b82cdfe6 /drivers/gpu
parent510650e8b2ab965931b35e9813467439d4df0b9c (diff)
drm/i915: Adjust size of PIPE_CONTROL used for gen8 render seqno write
We started to use PIPE_CONTROL to write render ring seqno in order to combat seqno write vs interrupt generation problems. This was introduced by commit 7c17d377374d ("drm/i915: Use ordered seqno write interrupt generation on gen8+ execlists"). On gen8+ size of PIPE_CONTROL with Post Sync Operation should be 6 dwords. When we're using older 5-dword variant it's possible to observe inconsistent values written by PIPE_CONTROL with Post Sync Operation from user batches, resulting in rendering corruptions. v2: Fix BAT failures v3: Comments on alignment and thrashing high dword of seqno (Chris) v4: Updated commit msg (Mika) Testcase: igt/gem_pipe_control_store_loop/*-qword-write Issue: VIZ-7393 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Tested-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460469115-26002-1-git-send-email-michal.winiarski@intel.com (cherry picked from commit ce81a65c79d6012a384563caf76d47e28947a347) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c10
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 48b612d80784..5c6080fd0968 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1913,15 +1913,18 @@ static int gen8_emit_request_render(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf = request->ringbuf;
int ret;
- ret = intel_logical_ring_begin(request, 6 + WA_TAIL_DWORDS);
+ ret = intel_logical_ring_begin(request, 8 + WA_TAIL_DWORDS);
if (ret)
return ret;
+ /* We're using qword write, seqno should be aligned to 8 bytes. */
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX & 1);
+
/* w/a for post sync ops following a GPGPU operation we
* need a prior CS_STALL, which is emitted by the flush
* following the batch.
*/
- intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(5));
+ intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6));
intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf,
(PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB |
PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL |
@@ -1929,7 +1932,10 @@ static int gen8_emit_request_render(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, hws_seqno_address(request->ring));
intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, 0);
intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, i915_gem_request_get_seqno(request));
+ /* We're thrashing one dword of HWS. */
+ intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, 0);
intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_USER_INTERRUPT);
+ intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_NOOP);
return intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(request);
}