summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2012-07-15 09:42:38 +0100
committerDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>2012-08-06 10:43:29 +0200
commitbcf9dcc1e6269fac674e41f25d007ff75f76e840 (patch)
tree5214fb0558219c613179e12afef33112387d4946 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
parentfaea35dd8a9d3605c411c8ecd7f97f0f9ecbaf58 (diff)
drm/i915: Workaround hang with BSD and forcewake on SandyBridge
For reasons that are not apparent to anybody, 990bbdadaba (drm/i915: Group the GT routines together in both code and vtable) breaks the use of the BitStream Decoder ring on SandyBridge. The active ingredient of that patch is the conversion from a udelay(10) to a udelay(1) in the busy-wait loop of waiting for the forcewake acknowledge. If we restore that udelay(10) or insert another udelay(1) afterwards (or any wait longer than 250ns) everything works again. An alternative is also to remove any delay from the busy-wait loop. Given that in the atomic sections we want to complete the wait as quick as possible to avoid blocking the CPU for too long, it makes sense to remove the delay altogether and simply spin on the exit condition until it completes. So we replace the udelay(1) with cpu_relax(). Papers over regression from commit 990bbdadabaa51828e475eda86ee5720a4910cc3 Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Mon Jul 2 11:51:02 2012 -0300 drm/i915: Group the GT routines together in both code and vtable Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51738 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h19
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 3afe3550e4ae..132ab511b90c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -46,15 +46,16 @@
})
#define wait_for_atomic_us(COND, US) ({ \
- int i, ret__ = -ETIMEDOUT; \
- for (i = 0; i < (US); i++) { \
- if ((COND)) { \
- ret__ = 0; \
- break; \
- } \
- udelay(1); \
- } \
- ret__; \
+ unsigned long timeout__ = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(US); \
+ int ret__ = 0; \
+ while (!(COND)) { \
+ if (time_after(jiffies, timeout__)) { \
+ ret__ = -ETIMEDOUT; \
+ break; \
+ } \
+ cpu_relax(); \
+ } \
+ ret__; \
})
#define wait_for(COND, MS) _wait_for(COND, MS, 1)