diff options
author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> | 2020-10-07 11:06:48 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> | 2020-10-09 14:43:29 -0400 |
commit | 637f7576ece1db9474a6d4700fdcef3c82ea87b5 (patch) | |
tree | bb58c671c32e8ed323d62b5cdc2b9859c85f2185 /drivers/cpufreq | |
parent | 9526e431c5260eeebfa575ff38f2d5cd6077f8f9 (diff) |
drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_record)
instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d35.pJToGs3H9khZK6ws%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions