diff options
author | Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> | 2021-03-04 09:21:33 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> | 2021-04-08 13:23:41 +0200 |
commit | 212709926c5493a566ca4086ad4f4b0d4e66b553 (patch) | |
tree | 0c6b25566ff5d3429433fe92efda716bfe16624e /drivers/clocksource | |
parent | 446e1a943554e07a4e6431fff6dd06c0f130895a (diff) |
clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Fix posted mode status check order
When the timer is configured in posted mode, we need to check the write-
posted status register (TWPS) before writing to the register.
We now check TWPS after the write starting with commit 52762fbd1c47
("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Add clockevent and clocksource
support").
For example, in the TRM for am571x the following is documented in chapter
"22.2.4.13.1.1 Write Posting Synchronization Mode":
"For each register, a status bit is provided in the timer write-posted
status (TWPS) register. In this mode, it is mandatory that software check
this status bit before any write access. If a write is attempted to a
register with a previous access pending, the previous access is discarded
without notice."
The regression happened when I updated the code to use standard read/write
accessors for the driver instead of using __omap_dm_timer_load_start().
We have__omap_dm_timer_load_start() check the TWPS status correctly using
__omap_dm_timer_write().
Fixes: 52762fbd1c47 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Add clockevent and clocksource support")
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210304072135.52712-2-tony@atomide.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/clocksource')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c index 614c8380f3e9..3a654349623e 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c @@ -449,13 +449,13 @@ static int dmtimer_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles, struct dmtimer_systimer *t = &clkevt->t; void __iomem *pend = t->base + t->pend; - writel_relaxed(0xffffffff - cycles, t->base + t->counter); while (readl_relaxed(pend) & WP_TCRR) cpu_relax(); + writel_relaxed(0xffffffff - cycles, t->base + t->counter); - writel_relaxed(OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_ST, t->base + t->ctrl); while (readl_relaxed(pend) & WP_TCLR) cpu_relax(); + writel_relaxed(OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_ST, t->base + t->ctrl); return 0; } @@ -490,18 +490,18 @@ static int dmtimer_set_periodic(struct clock_event_device *evt) dmtimer_clockevent_shutdown(evt); /* Looks like we need to first set the load value separately */ - writel_relaxed(clkevt->period, t->base + t->load); while (readl_relaxed(pend) & WP_TLDR) cpu_relax(); + writel_relaxed(clkevt->period, t->base + t->load); - writel_relaxed(clkevt->period, t->base + t->counter); while (readl_relaxed(pend) & WP_TCRR) cpu_relax(); + writel_relaxed(clkevt->period, t->base + t->counter); - writel_relaxed(OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_AR | OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_ST, - t->base + t->ctrl); while (readl_relaxed(pend) & WP_TCLR) cpu_relax(); + writel_relaxed(OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_AR | OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_ST, + t->base + t->ctrl); return 0; } |