summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>2011-03-23 22:15:54 +0100
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>2011-03-23 22:15:54 +0100
commitf3c6ea1b06c71b43f751b36bd99345369fe911af (patch)
treea7ed142d4a183cc97fa7fc2af1cc5dec61827aa2 /arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr
parent4bbba111d94781d34081c37856bbc5eb33f6c72a (diff)
x86: Use syscore_ops instead of sysdev classes and sysdevs
Some subsystems in the x86 tree need to carry out suspend/resume and shutdown operations with one CPU on-line and interrupts disabled and they define sysdev classes and sysdevs or sysdev drivers for this purpose. This leads to unnecessarily complicated code and excessive memory usage, so switch them to using struct syscore_ops objects for this purpose instead. Generally, there are three categories of subsystems that use sysdevs for implementing PM operations: (1) subsystems whose suspend/resume callbacks ignore their arguments entirely (the majority), (2) subsystems whose suspend/resume callbacks use their struct sys_device argument, but don't really need to do that, because they can be implemented differently in an arguably simpler way (io_apic.c), and (3) subsystems whose suspend/resume callbacks use their struct sys_device argument, but the value of that argument is always the same and could be ignored (microcode_core.c). In all of these cases the subsystems in question may be readily converted to using struct syscore_ops objects for power management and shutdown. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c10
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
index bebabec5b448..307dfbbf4a8e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <asm/e820.h>
@@ -630,7 +631,7 @@ struct mtrr_value {
static struct mtrr_value mtrr_value[MTRR_MAX_VAR_RANGES];
-static int mtrr_save(struct sys_device *sysdev, pm_message_t state)
+static int mtrr_save(void)
{
int i;
@@ -642,7 +643,7 @@ static int mtrr_save(struct sys_device *sysdev, pm_message_t state)
return 0;
}
-static int mtrr_restore(struct sys_device *sysdev)
+static void mtrr_restore(void)
{
int i;
@@ -653,12 +654,11 @@ static int mtrr_restore(struct sys_device *sysdev)
mtrr_value[i].ltype);
}
}
- return 0;
}
-static struct sysdev_driver mtrr_sysdev_driver = {
+static struct syscore_ops mtrr_syscore_ops = {
.suspend = mtrr_save,
.resume = mtrr_restore,
};
@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static int __init mtrr_init_finialize(void)
* TBD: is there any system with such CPU which supports
* suspend/resume? If no, we should remove the code.
*/
- sysdev_driver_register(&cpu_sysdev_class, &mtrr_sysdev_driver);
+ register_syscore_ops(&mtrr_syscore_ops);
return 0;
}