summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>2017-11-14 16:54:23 -0500
committerRadim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>2017-12-05 21:16:43 +0100
commitf775b13eedee2f7f3c6fdd4e90fb79090ce5d339 (patch)
tree944d1c4bdb8ffaa828b694bc1edea935dd667ffa /arch/x86/include
parent609b7002705ae72a6ca45b633b7ff1a09a7a0d86 (diff)
x86,kvm: move qemu/guest FPU switching out to vcpu_run
Currently, every time a VCPU is scheduled out, the host kernel will first save the guest FPU/xstate context, then load the qemu userspace FPU context, only to then immediately save the qemu userspace FPU context back to memory. When scheduling in a VCPU, the same extraneous FPU loads and saves are done. This could be avoided by moving from a model where the guest FPU is loaded and stored with preemption disabled, to a model where the qemu userspace FPU is swapped out for the guest FPU context for the duration of the KVM_RUN ioctl. This is done under the VCPU mutex, which is also taken when other tasks inspect the VCPU FPU context, so the code should already be safe for this change. That should come as no surprise, given that s390 already has this optimization. This can fix a bug where KVM calls get_user_pages while owning the FPU, and the file system ends up requesting the FPU again: [258270.527947] __warn+0xcb/0xf0 [258270.527948] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 [258270.527951] kernel_fpu_disable+0x3f/0x50 [258270.527953] __kernel_fpu_begin+0x49/0x100 [258270.527955] kernel_fpu_begin+0xe/0x10 [258270.527958] crc32c_pcl_intel_update+0x84/0xb0 [258270.527961] crypto_shash_update+0x3f/0x110 [258270.527968] crc32c+0x63/0x8a [libcrc32c] [258270.527975] dm_bm_checksum+0x1b/0x20 [dm_persistent_data] [258270.527978] node_prepare_for_write+0x44/0x70 [dm_persistent_data] [258270.527985] dm_block_manager_write_callback+0x41/0x50 [dm_persistent_data] [258270.527988] submit_io+0x170/0x1b0 [dm_bufio] [258270.527992] __write_dirty_buffer+0x89/0x90 [dm_bufio] [258270.527994] __make_buffer_clean+0x4f/0x80 [dm_bufio] [258270.527996] __try_evict_buffer+0x42/0x60 [dm_bufio] [258270.527998] dm_bufio_shrink_scan+0xc0/0x130 [dm_bufio] [258270.528002] shrink_slab.part.40+0x1f5/0x420 [258270.528004] shrink_node+0x22c/0x320 [258270.528006] do_try_to_free_pages+0xf5/0x330 [258270.528008] try_to_free_pages+0xe9/0x190 [258270.528009] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x40f/0xba0 [258270.528011] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x209/0x260 [258270.528014] alloc_pages_vma+0x1f1/0x250 [258270.528017] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0x123/0x660 [258270.528021] handle_mm_fault+0xfd3/0x1330 [258270.528025] __get_user_pages+0x113/0x640 [258270.528027] get_user_pages+0x4f/0x60 [258270.528063] __gfn_to_pfn_memslot+0x120/0x3f0 [kvm] [258270.528108] try_async_pf+0x66/0x230 [kvm] [258270.528135] tdp_page_fault+0x130/0x280 [kvm] [258270.528149] kvm_mmu_page_fault+0x60/0x120 [kvm] [258270.528158] handle_ept_violation+0x91/0x170 [kvm_intel] [258270.528162] vmx_handle_exit+0x1ca/0x1400 [kvm_intel] No performance changes were detected in quick ping-pong tests on my 4 socket system, which is expected since an FPU+xstate load is on the order of 0.1us, while ping-ponging between CPUs is on the order of 20us, and somewhat noisy. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> [Fixed a bug where reset_vcpu called put_fpu without preceding load_fpu, which happened inside from KVM_CREATE_VCPU ioctl. - Radim] Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/include')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h13
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 977de5fb968b..62527e053ee4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -536,7 +536,20 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache mmu_page_cache;
struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache mmu_page_header_cache;
+ /*
+ * QEMU userspace and the guest each have their own FPU state.
+ * In vcpu_run, we switch between the user and guest FPU contexts.
+ * While running a VCPU, the VCPU thread will have the guest FPU
+ * context.
+ *
+ * Note that while the PKRU state lives inside the fpu registers,
+ * it is switched out separately at VMENTER and VMEXIT time. The
+ * "guest_fpu" state here contains the guest FPU context, with the
+ * host PRKU bits.
+ */
+ struct fpu user_fpu;
struct fpu guest_fpu;
+
u64 xcr0;
u64 guest_supported_xcr0;
u32 guest_xstate_size;