diff options
author | Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> | 2012-12-20 15:32:09 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> | 2013-01-07 19:53:41 -0200 |
commit | 48a3e950f4cee6a345ffbe9baf599f1e9a54c479 (patch) | |
tree | 3e60015a025df89b28df12c6470babbfb566e766 /arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | |
parent | d8346b7d9bab37e6cc712ff1622c65ff98bdfef8 (diff) |
KVM: s390: Add support for machine checks.
Add support for injecting machine checks (only repressible
conditions for now).
This is a bit more involved than I/O interrupts, for these reasons:
- Machine checks come in both floating and cpu varieties.
- We don't have a bit for machine checks enabling, but have to use
a roundabout approach with trapping PSW changing instructions and
watching for opened machine checks.
Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/s390/kvm/priv.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 135 |
1 files changed, 135 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c index d715842f56ca..d3cbcd3c9ada 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ #include <asm/debug.h> #include <asm/ebcdic.h> #include <asm/sysinfo.h> +#include <asm/ptrace.h> +#include <asm/compat.h> #include "gaccess.h" #include "kvm-s390.h" #include "trace.h" @@ -166,6 +168,99 @@ static int handle_stfl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return 0; } +static void handle_new_psw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + /* Check whether the new psw is enabled for machine checks. */ + if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_MCHECK) + kvm_s390_deliver_pending_machine_checks(vcpu); +} + +#define PSW_MASK_ADDR_MODE (PSW_MASK_EA | PSW_MASK_BA) +#define PSW_MASK_UNASSIGNED 0xb80800fe7fffffffUL +#define PSW_ADDR_24 0x00000000000fffffUL +#define PSW_ADDR_31 0x000000007fffffffUL + +int kvm_s390_handle_lpsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + u64 addr; + psw_compat_t new_psw; + + if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) + return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, + PGM_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION); + + addr = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu); + + if (addr & 7) { + kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION); + goto out; + } + + if (copy_from_guest(vcpu, &new_psw, addr, sizeof(new_psw))) { + kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_ADDRESSING); + goto out; + } + + if (!(new_psw.mask & PSW32_MASK_BASE)) { + kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION); + goto out; + } + + vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask = + (new_psw.mask & ~PSW32_MASK_BASE) << 32; + vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr = new_psw.addr; + + if ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_UNASSIGNED) || + (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_ADDR_MODE) && + (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr & ~PSW_ADDR_24)) || + ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_ADDR_MODE) == + PSW_MASK_EA)) { + kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION); + goto out; + } + + handle_new_psw(vcpu); +out: + return 0; +} + +static int handle_lpswe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + u64 addr; + psw_t new_psw; + + addr = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu); + + if (addr & 7) { + kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION); + goto out; + } + + if (copy_from_guest(vcpu, &new_psw, addr, sizeof(new_psw))) { + kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_ADDRESSING); + goto out; + } + + vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask = new_psw.mask; + vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr = new_psw.addr; + + if ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_UNASSIGNED) || + (((vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_ADDR_MODE) == + PSW_MASK_BA) && + (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr & ~PSW_ADDR_31)) || + (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_ADDR_MODE) && + (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr & ~PSW_ADDR_24)) || + ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_ADDR_MODE) == + PSW_MASK_EA)) { + kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION); + goto out; + } + + handle_new_psw(vcpu); +out: + return 0; +} + static int handle_stidp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { u64 operand2; @@ -292,6 +387,7 @@ static const intercept_handler_t priv_handlers[256] = { [0x5f] = handle_chsc, [0x7d] = handle_stsi, [0xb1] = handle_stfl, + [0xb2] = handle_lpswe, }; int kvm_s390_handle_b2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) @@ -316,6 +412,45 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_b2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return -EOPNOTSUPP; } +static int handle_epsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + int reg1, reg2; + + reg1 = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x00f00000) >> 24; + reg2 = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x000f0000) >> 16; + + /* This basically extracts the mask half of the psw. */ + vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] &= 0xffffffff00000000; + vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] |= vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask >> 32; + if (reg2) { + vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg2] &= 0xffffffff00000000; + vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg2] |= + vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & 0x00000000ffffffff; + } + return 0; +} + +static const intercept_handler_t b9_handlers[256] = { + [0x8d] = handle_epsw, +}; + +int kvm_s390_handle_b9(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + intercept_handler_t handler; + + /* This is handled just as for the B2 instructions. */ + handler = b9_handlers[vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x00ff]; + if (handler) { + if ((handler != handle_epsw) && + (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)) + return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, + PGM_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION); + else + return handler(vcpu); + } + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + static int handle_tprot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { u64 address1, address2; |