summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>2012-07-05 08:05:15 -0700
committerTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>2012-07-05 08:05:15 -0700
commit1c213ba16ed8f48fc12dfec8a588d608ffef0904 (patch)
treee121a5f4fa9a2f99e28ca8abc3fb9b42e9e2465e /arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
parent353cec46d50a38e412112e23f9542c3d6e51a308 (diff)
ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class
Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall under omap3 class (cpu_is_omap34xx() = true), since it carries Cortex-A8 core. But while adding complete baseport support (like, clock, power and hwmod) support, it is observed that, we are creating more and more problems by treating am33xx device as omap3 family, as nothing matches between them (except cortex-A8 mpu). So, after long discussion we have came to the conclusion that, we should not consider am33xx device as omap3 family, instead create separate class (SOC_AM33XX) under OMAP2PLUS. This means, for am33xx device, cpu_is_omap34xx() will return false, and only cpu_is_am33xx() will be true. Please refer to the link below, for mailing-list discussion on this - http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg69439.html Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [tony@atomide.com: fixed typo, updated for soc_is changes] Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig4
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
index 042f157a8f94..3649a34db00d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
@@ -82,8 +82,10 @@ config SOC_TI81XX
config SOC_AM33XX
bool "AM33XX support"
- depends on ARCH_OMAP3
default y
+ select CPU_V7
+ select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND if PM
+ select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
config OMAP_PACKAGE_ZAF
bool