diff options
author | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> | 2017-07-19 15:23:27 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> | 2017-07-26 13:43:17 -0400 |
commit | da48c948c263c9d87dfc64566b3373a858cc8aa2 (patch) | |
tree | 55556bb4644cbfcff2134d02daeb0e8c873079d7 /Documentation/gcc-plugins.txt | |
parent | 14330d7f08bab92029f0c95c70fe200e8d76b31e (diff) |
media: fix warning on v4l2_subdev_call() result interpreted as bool
v4l2_subdev_call is a macro returning whatever the callback return
type is, usually 'int'. With gcc-7 and ccache, this can lead to
many wanings like:
media/platform/pxa_camera.c: In function 'pxa_mbus_build_fmts_xlate':
media/platform/pxa_camera.c:766:27: error: ?: using integer constants in boolean context [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
while (!v4l2_subdev_call(subdev, pad, enum_mbus_code, NULL, &code)) {
media/atomisp/pci/atomisp2/atomisp_cmd.c: In function 'atomisp_s_ae_window':
media/atomisp/pci/atomisp2/atomisp_cmd.c:6414:52: error: ?: using integer constants in boolean context [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
if (v4l2_subdev_call(isp->inputs[asd->input_curr].camera,
The problem here is that after preprocessing, we the compiler
sees a variation of
if (a ? 0 : 2)
that it thinks is suspicious.
This replaces the ?: operator with an different expression that
does the same thing in a more easily readable way that cannot
tigger the warning
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/14/156
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/gcc-plugins.txt')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions