diff options
author | John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> | 2020-04-01 21:05:37 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-04-02 09:35:27 -0700 |
commit | 1970dc6f5226416957ad0cc70ab47386ed3195a6 (patch) | |
tree | af17c6c4e04a023603d0f568ced8d6a7a705827c /Documentation/core-api | |
parent | 47e29d32afba11b13efb51f03154a8cf22fb4360 (diff) |
mm/gup: /proc/vmstat: pin_user_pages (FOLL_PIN) reporting
Now that pages are "DMA-pinned" via pin_user_page*(), and unpinned via
unpin_user_pages*(), we need some visibility into whether all of this is
working correctly.
Add two new fields to /proc/vmstat:
nr_foll_pin_acquired
nr_foll_pin_released
These are documented in Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst. They
represent the number of pages (since boot time) that have been pinned
("nr_foll_pin_acquired") and unpinned ("nr_foll_pin_released"), via
pin_user_pages*() and unpin_user_pages*().
In the absence of long-running DMA or RDMA operations that hold pages
pinned, the above two fields will normally be equal to each other.
Also: update Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst, to remove an
earlier (now confirmed untrue) claim about a performance problem with
/proc/vmstat.
Also: update Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst to rename the new
/proc/vmstat entries, to the names listed here.
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211001536.1027652-9-jhubbard@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/core-api')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst | 33 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst b/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst index 7e5dd8b1b3f2..5c8a5f89756b 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst @@ -208,12 +208,35 @@ has the following new calls to exercise the new pin*() wrapper functions: You can monitor how many total dma-pinned pages have been acquired and released since the system was booted, via two new /proc/vmstat entries: :: - /proc/vmstat/nr_foll_pin_requested - /proc/vmstat/nr_foll_pin_requested + /proc/vmstat/nr_foll_pin_acquired + /proc/vmstat/nr_foll_pin_released -Those are both going to show zero, unless CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is set. This is -because there is a noticeable performance drop in unpin_user_page(), when they -are activated. +Under normal conditions, these two values will be equal unless there are any +long-term [R]DMA pins in place, or during pin/unpin transitions. + +* nr_foll_pin_acquired: This is the number of logical pins that have been + acquired since the system was powered on. For huge pages, the head page is + pinned once for each page (head page and each tail page) within the huge page. + This follows the same sort of behavior that get_user_pages() uses for huge + pages: the head page is refcounted once for each tail or head page in the huge + page, when get_user_pages() is applied to a huge page. + +* nr_foll_pin_released: The number of logical pins that have been released since + the system was powered on. Note that pages are released (unpinned) on a + PAGE_SIZE granularity, even if the original pin was applied to a huge page. + Becaused of the pin count behavior described above in "nr_foll_pin_acquired", + the accounting balances out, so that after doing this:: + + pin_user_pages(huge_page); + for (each page in huge_page) + unpin_user_page(page); + +...the following is expected:: + + nr_foll_pin_released == nr_foll_pin_acquired + +(...unless it was already out of balance due to a long-term RDMA pin being in +place.) References ========== |