diff options
author | Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> | 2017-04-08 11:07:43 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2017-04-09 09:26:29 +0200 |
commit | ef9209b642f13fc293b27612d7d1d4c9de1b5b75 (patch) | |
tree | 3a827f072999ffe1b7a1cab523f58e96cf6182f3 | |
parent | 3498d6844cbb19b64dfc3dc73d222de461f7068a (diff) |
staging: rtl8723bs: Fix indenting errors and an off-by-one mistake in core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
Smatch lists the following:
CHECK drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:525 _mgt_dispatcher() warn: inconsistent indenting
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:1595 OnAssocReq() error: buffer overflow 'pstapriv->sta_aid' 32 <= 32
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:2391 dump_mgntframe_and_wait() warn: inconsistent indenting
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:2420 dump_mgntframe_and_wait_ack() warn: inconsistent indenting
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:4969 process_80211d() error: testing array offset 'i' after use.
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:5738 linked_status_chk() warn: inconsistent indenting
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:6459 sitesurvey_cmd_hdl() warn: inconsistent indenting
The indenting problems were fixed with white-space changes. The error at
line 1595 was the result of an off-by-one error in a for loop. The error
at line 4969 was not fixed as that code lies inside a block of code that
only is needed for 5G channels. This chip only works at 2.4 GHz.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 25 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c index e0a3cd64777f..18e78d5198c3 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c @@ -522,15 +522,14 @@ static void _mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, struct mlme_handler *ptabl u8 bc_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff}; u8 *pframe = precv_frame->u.hdr.rx_data; - if (ptable->func) { - /* receive the frames that ra(a1) is my address or ra(a1) is bc address. */ - if (memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), myid(&padapter->eeprompriv), ETH_ALEN) && - memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), bc_addr, ETH_ALEN)) - return; - - ptable->func(padapter, precv_frame); - } + if (ptable->func) { + /* receive the frames that ra(a1) is my address or ra(a1) is bc address. */ + if (memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), myid(&padapter->eeprompriv), ETH_ALEN) && + memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), bc_addr, ETH_ALEN)) + return; + ptable->func(padapter, precv_frame); + } } void mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *precv_frame) @@ -1575,7 +1574,7 @@ unsigned int OnAssocReq(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *precv_frame) if (pstat->aid > 0) { DBG_871X(" old AID %d\n", pstat->aid); } else { - for (pstat->aid = 1; pstat->aid <= NUM_STA; pstat->aid++) + for (pstat->aid = 1; pstat->aid < NUM_STA; pstat->aid++) if (pstapriv->sta_aid[pstat->aid - 1] == NULL) break; @@ -2388,7 +2387,7 @@ s32 dump_mgntframe_and_wait(struct adapter *padapter, struct xmit_frame *pmgntfr pxmitbuf->sctx = NULL; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pxmitpriv->lock_sctx, irqL); - return ret; + return ret; } s32 dump_mgntframe_and_wait_ack(struct adapter *padapter, struct xmit_frame *pmgntframe) @@ -2417,7 +2416,7 @@ s32 dump_mgntframe_and_wait_ack(struct adapter *padapter, struct xmit_frame *pmg mutex_unlock(&pxmitpriv->ack_tx_mutex); } - return ret; + return ret; } static int update_hidden_ssid(u8 *ies, u32 ies_len, u8 hidden_ssid_mode) @@ -5735,7 +5734,7 @@ void linked_status_chk(struct adapter *padapter) #else rx_chk_limit = 8; #endif - link_count_limit = 7; /* 16 sec */ + link_count_limit = 7; /* 16 sec */ /* Marked by Kurt 20130715 */ /* For WiDi 3.5 and latered on, they don't ask WiDi sink to do roaming, so we could not check rx limit that strictly. */ @@ -6456,7 +6455,7 @@ u8 sitesurvey_cmd_hdl(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pbuf) Switch_DM_Func(padapter, DYNAMIC_FUNC_DISABLE, false); /* config the initial gain under scaning, need to write the BB registers */ - initialgain = 0x1e; + initialgain = 0x1e; rtw_hal_set_hwreg(padapter, HW_VAR_INITIAL_GAIN, (u8 *)(&initialgain)); |