diff options
| author | Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> | 2018-03-24 12:58:29 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> | 2018-03-27 11:02:27 +0100 |
| commit | eed7ec52f214bac2f25395ccaad610fbeb842a6e (patch) | |
| tree | 5ff794f27b0b947e0ae74104c6cc5573e6719041 | |
| parent | 7487508eff1fe787573aa6e0f3daaa6b12bd4520 (diff) | |
drm/i915/execlists: Clear user-active flag on preemption completion
When cancelling the requests and clearing out the ports following a
successful preemption completion, also clear the active flag. I had
assumed that all preemptions would be followed by an immediate dequeue
(preserving the active user flag), but under rare circumstances we may
be triggering a preemption for the second port only for it to have
completed before the preemotion kicks in; leaving execlists->active set
even though the system is now idle.
We can clear the flag inside the common execlists_cancel_port_requests()
as the other users also expect the semantics of active being cleared.
Fixes: f6322eddaff7 ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180324125829.27026-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c index b4ab06b05e58..9c84af53db94 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c @@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) * know the next preemption status we see corresponds * to this ELSP update. */ + GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists_is_active(execlists, + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER)); GEM_BUG_ON(!port_count(&port[0])); if (port_count(&port[0]) > 1) goto unlock; @@ -738,6 +740,8 @@ execlists_cancel_port_requests(struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists) memset(port, 0, sizeof(*port)); port++; } + + execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER); } static void clear_gtiir(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) @@ -1042,6 +1046,11 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data) if (fw) intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, execlists->fw_domains); + + /* If the engine is now idle, so should be the flag; and vice versa. */ + GEM_BUG_ON(execlists_is_active(&engine->execlists, + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER) == + !port_isset(engine->execlists.port)); } static void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, |