diff options
| author | Emoly Liu <emoly.liu@intel.com> | 2016-06-18 23:53:11 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2016-06-18 21:18:43 -0700 |
| commit | d719d2ddd12f0c7e1706d086786647190378f6e0 (patch) | |
| tree | ce8a745990887828e9658f78c7318b987c382255 | |
| parent | f1b91de88a8b39f76caa74100cf44828226e00df (diff) | |
staging/lustre: Keep logical continuations on the previous line
This patch fixes all checkpatch occurences of
"CHECK: Logical continuations should be on the previous line"
in Lustre code.
Signed-off-by: Emoly Liu <emoly.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c | 9 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_config.c | 4 |
2 files changed, 6 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c index 38c507ffd97c..d6b61bc39135 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c @@ -255,14 +255,13 @@ reprocess: * overflow and underflow. */ if ((new->l_policy_data.l_flock.start > - (lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.end + 1)) - && (lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.end != - OBD_OBJECT_EOF)) + (lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.end + 1)) && + (lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.end != OBD_OBJECT_EOF)) continue; if ((new->l_policy_data.l_flock.end < - (lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.start - 1)) - && (lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.start != 0)) + (lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.start - 1)) && + (lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.start != 0)) break; if (new->l_policy_data.l_flock.start < diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_config.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_config.c index 694c58e7e4f8..f1c41a11c0bd 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_config.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_config.c @@ -1017,8 +1017,8 @@ int class_process_proc_param(char *prefix, struct lprocfs_vars *lvars, /* Search proc entries */ while (lvars[j].name) { var = &lvars[j]; - if (!class_match_param(key, var->name, NULL) - && keylen == strlen(var->name)) { + if (!class_match_param(key, var->name, NULL) && + keylen == strlen(var->name)) { matched++; rc = -EROFS; if (var->fops && var->fops->write) { |