diff options
author | Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> | 2014-01-23 15:53:01 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-01-23 16:36:51 -0800 |
commit | 96403da244443d9842dbf290c2a02390b78a158e (patch) | |
tree | ca3ccfc550f9c3ef0cf2baa634e784a6a66b3f73 | |
parent | 959c8963fc6c8c9b97e80c55ce77105247040e7d (diff) |
memcg: fix possible NULL deref while traversing memcg_slab_caches list
All caches of the same memory cgroup are linked in the memcg_slab_caches
list via kmem_cache::memcg_params::list. This list is traversed, for
example, when we read memory.kmem.slabinfo.
Since the list actually consists of memcg_cache_params objects, we have
to convert an element of the list to a kmem_cache object using
memcg_params_to_cache(), which obtains the pointer to the cache from the
memcg_params::memcg_caches array of the corresponding root cache. That
said the pointer to a kmem_cache in its parent's memcg_params must be
initialized before adding the cache to the list, and cleared only after
it has been unlinked. Currently it is vice-versa, which can result in a
NULL ptr dereference while traversing the memcg_slab_caches list. This
patch restores the correct order.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 25 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 322d18dc17f0..014a4f1acf1c 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -3270,9 +3270,6 @@ void memcg_register_cache(struct kmem_cache *s) css_get(&memcg->css); - mutex_lock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex); - list_add(&s->memcg_params->list, &memcg->memcg_slab_caches); - mutex_unlock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex); /* * Since readers won't lock (see cache_from_memcg_idx()), we need a @@ -3281,7 +3278,16 @@ void memcg_register_cache(struct kmem_cache *s) */ smp_wmb(); + /* + * Initialize the pointer to this cache in its parent's memcg_params + * before adding it to the memcg_slab_caches list, otherwise we can + * fail to convert memcg_params_to_cache() while traversing the list. + */ root->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id] = s; + + mutex_lock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex); + list_add(&s->memcg_params->list, &memcg->memcg_slab_caches); + mutex_unlock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex); } void memcg_unregister_cache(struct kmem_cache *s) @@ -3293,16 +3299,21 @@ void memcg_unregister_cache(struct kmem_cache *s) if (is_root_cache(s)) return; - memcg = s->memcg_params->memcg; - id = memcg_cache_id(memcg); - root = s->memcg_params->root_cache; - root->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id] = NULL; + memcg = s->memcg_params->memcg; + id = memcg_cache_id(memcg); mutex_lock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex); list_del(&s->memcg_params->list); mutex_unlock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex); + /* + * Clear the pointer to this cache in its parent's memcg_params only + * after removing it from the memcg_slab_caches list, otherwise we can + * fail to convert memcg_params_to_cache() while traversing the list. + */ + root->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id] = NULL; + css_put(&memcg->css); } |