diff options
author | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2017-08-16 01:45:33 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2017-08-15 17:32:15 -0700 |
commit | 88a5c690b66110ad255380d8f629c629cf6ca559 (patch) | |
tree | f2c4151bf0deb258d60c0a5dc0e1d13d77fcf8e6 | |
parent | 0e405232871d67bf1b238d56b6b3d500e69ebbf3 (diff) |
bpf: fix bpf_trace_printk on 32 bit archs
James reported that on MIPS32 bpf_trace_printk() is currently
broken while MIPS64 works fine:
bpf_trace_printk() uses conditional operators to attempt to
pass different types to __trace_printk() depending on the
format operators. This doesn't work as intended on 32-bit
architectures where u32 and long are passed differently to
u64, since the result of C conditional operators follows the
"usual arithmetic conversions" rules, such that the values
passed to __trace_printk() will always be u64 [causing issues
later in the va_list handling for vscnprintf()].
For example the samples/bpf/tracex5 test printed lines like
below on MIPS32, where the fd and buf have come from the u64
fd argument, and the size from the buf argument:
[...] 1180.941542: 0x00000001: write(fd=1, buf= (null), size=6258688)
Instead of this:
[...] 1625.616026: 0x00000001: write(fd=1, buf=009e4000, size=512)
One way to get it working is to expand various combinations
of argument types into 8 different combinations for 32 bit
and 64 bit kernels. Fix tested by James on MIPS32 and MIPS64
as well that it resolves the issue.
Fixes: 9c959c863f82 ("tracing: Allow BPF programs to call bpf_trace_printk()")
Reported-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Tested-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 34 |
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 37385193a608..dc498b605d5d 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -204,10 +204,36 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_trace_printk, char *, fmt, u32, fmt_size, u64, arg1, fmt_cnt++; } - return __trace_printk(1/* fake ip will not be printed */, fmt, - mod[0] == 2 ? arg1 : mod[0] == 1 ? (long) arg1 : (u32) arg1, - mod[1] == 2 ? arg2 : mod[1] == 1 ? (long) arg2 : (u32) arg2, - mod[2] == 2 ? arg3 : mod[2] == 1 ? (long) arg3 : (u32) arg3); +/* Horrid workaround for getting va_list handling working with different + * argument type combinations generically for 32 and 64 bit archs. + */ +#define __BPF_TP_EMIT() __BPF_ARG3_TP() +#define __BPF_TP(...) \ + __trace_printk(1 /* Fake ip will not be printed. */, \ + fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) + +#define __BPF_ARG1_TP(...) \ + ((mod[0] == 2 || (mod[0] == 1 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 64)) \ + ? __BPF_TP(arg1, ##__VA_ARGS__) \ + : ((mod[0] == 1 || (mod[0] == 0 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 32)) \ + ? __BPF_TP((long)arg1, ##__VA_ARGS__) \ + : __BPF_TP((u32)arg1, ##__VA_ARGS__))) + +#define __BPF_ARG2_TP(...) \ + ((mod[1] == 2 || (mod[1] == 1 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 64)) \ + ? __BPF_ARG1_TP(arg2, ##__VA_ARGS__) \ + : ((mod[1] == 1 || (mod[1] == 0 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 32)) \ + ? __BPF_ARG1_TP((long)arg2, ##__VA_ARGS__) \ + : __BPF_ARG1_TP((u32)arg2, ##__VA_ARGS__))) + +#define __BPF_ARG3_TP(...) \ + ((mod[2] == 2 || (mod[2] == 1 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 64)) \ + ? __BPF_ARG2_TP(arg3, ##__VA_ARGS__) \ + : ((mod[2] == 1 || (mod[2] == 0 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 32)) \ + ? __BPF_ARG2_TP((long)arg3, ##__VA_ARGS__) \ + : __BPF_ARG2_TP((u32)arg3, ##__VA_ARGS__))) + + return __BPF_TP_EMIT(); } static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_trace_printk_proto = { |