diff options
author | Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com> | 2016-07-08 15:52:42 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> | 2016-07-11 01:58:46 +0200 |
commit | 482333b277de181ce80c833d84f2598e2527b267 (patch) | |
tree | c21195b9d804a9cf02abec6ccf3bab3db253459d | |
parent | f23a9868b1c45e77ec6082eb95508885111ffda1 (diff) |
NFC: digital: Fix ACK & NACK PDUs handling in target mode
When the target receives a NACK PDU, it re-sends the last sent PDU.
ACK PDUs are received by the target as a reply from the initiator to
chained I-PDUs. There are 3 cases to handle:
- If the target has previously received 1 or more ATN PDUs and the PNI
in the ACK PDU is equal to the target PNI - 1, then it means that the
initiator did not received the last issued PDU from the target. In
this case it re-sends this PDU.
- If the target has received 1 or more ATN PDUs but the ACK PNI is not
the target PNI - 1, then this means that this ACK is the reply of the
previous chained I-PDU sent by the target. The target did not received
it on the first attempt and it is being re-sent by the initiator. The
process continues as usual.
- No ATN PDU received before this ACK PDU. This is the reply of a
chained I-PDU. The target keeps on processing its chained I-PDU.
The code has been refactored to avoid too many indentation levels.
Also, ACK and NACK PDUs were not freed. This is now fixed.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-rw-r--r-- | net/nfc/digital_dep.c | 71 |
1 files changed, 43 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/net/nfc/digital_dep.c b/net/nfc/digital_dep.c index 1778c23751d4..e0268777ab18 100644 --- a/net/nfc/digital_dep.c +++ b/net/nfc/digital_dep.c @@ -1141,49 +1141,64 @@ static void digital_tg_recv_dep_req(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, void *arg, rc = 0; break; case DIGITAL_NFC_DEP_PFB_ACK_NACK_PDU: - if (!DIGITAL_NFC_DEP_NACK_BIT_SET(pfb)) { /* ACK */ - if ((ddev->atn_count && - (DIGITAL_NFC_DEP_PFB_PNI(pfb - 1) != - ddev->curr_nfc_dep_pni)) || - (DIGITAL_NFC_DEP_PFB_PNI(pfb) != - ddev->curr_nfc_dep_pni) || - !ddev->chaining_skb || !ddev->saved_skb) { + if (DIGITAL_NFC_DEP_NACK_BIT_SET(pfb)) { /* NACK */ + if (DIGITAL_NFC_DEP_PFB_PNI(pfb + 1) != + ddev->curr_nfc_dep_pni) { rc = -EIO; goto exit; } - if (ddev->atn_count) { - ddev->atn_count = 0; + ddev->atn_count = 0; + + rc = digital_tg_send_saved_skb(ddev); + if (rc) + goto exit; + + goto free_resp; + } + + /* ACK */ + if (ddev->atn_count) { + /* The target has previously recevied one or more ATN + * PDUs. + */ + ddev->atn_count = 0; + /* If the ACK PNI is equal to the target PNI - 1 means + * that the initiator did not receive the previous PDU + * sent by the target so re-send it. + */ + if (DIGITAL_NFC_DEP_PFB_PNI(pfb + 1) == + ddev->curr_nfc_dep_pni) { rc = digital_tg_send_saved_skb(ddev); if (rc) goto exit; - return; + goto free_resp; } - kfree_skb(ddev->saved_skb); - ddev->saved_skb = NULL; + /* Otherwise, the target did not receive the previous + * ACK PDU from the initiator. Fallback to normal + * processing of chained PDU then. + */ + } - rc = digital_tg_send_dep_res(ddev, ddev->chaining_skb); - if (rc) - goto exit; - } else { /* NACK */ - if ((DIGITAL_NFC_DEP_PFB_PNI(pfb + 1) != - ddev->curr_nfc_dep_pni) || - !ddev->saved_skb) { - rc = -EIO; - goto exit; - } + /* Keep on sending chained PDU */ + if (!ddev->chaining_skb || + DIGITAL_NFC_DEP_PFB_PNI(pfb) != + ddev->curr_nfc_dep_pni) { + rc = -EIO; + goto exit; + } - ddev->atn_count = 0; + kfree_skb(ddev->saved_skb); + ddev->saved_skb = NULL; - rc = digital_tg_send_saved_skb(ddev); - if (rc) - goto exit; - } + rc = digital_tg_send_dep_res(ddev, ddev->chaining_skb); + if (rc) + goto exit; - return; + goto free_resp; case DIGITAL_NFC_DEP_PFB_SUPERVISOR_PDU: if (DIGITAL_NFC_DEP_PFB_IS_TIMEOUT(pfb)) { rc = -EINVAL; |