summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBreno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>2018-10-22 11:54:12 -0300
committerMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>2018-11-25 17:11:21 +1100
commit42e2acde1237878462b028f5a27d9cc5bea7502c (patch)
tree12521e10f294be5b61afd77957dd874dc737e311
parent54a21b5c941c3c5eb7478a660b6a3119100b2c8d (diff)
powerpc/64s: Include cpu header
Current powerpc security.c file is defining functions, as cpu_show_meltdown(), cpu_show_spectre_v{1,2} and others, that are being declared at linux/cpu.h header without including the header file that contains these declarations. This is being reported by sparse, which thinks that these functions are static, due to the lack of declaration: arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:105:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_meltdown' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:139:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spectre_v1' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:161:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spectre_v2' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:209:6: warning: symbol 'stf_barrier' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:289:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spec_store_bypass' was not declared. Should it be static? This patch simply includes the proper header (linux/cpu.h) to match function definition and declaration. Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
-rw-r--r--arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c
index f6f469fc4073..9703dce36307 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
//
// Copyright 2018, Michael Ellerman, IBM Corporation.
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/seq_buf.h>