diff options
author | Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> | 2020-09-04 08:47:05 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2020-09-21 15:56:53 +0200 |
commit | 36050d8984ab743f9990a2eb97a0062fdc3d7bbd (patch) | |
tree | 526c6da741b6a7f8ccbd2c77915cecff82484be5 | |
parent | 3ad1c8ef083bef96ec922688966484be1039e6b5 (diff) |
cpuidle: psci: Fix suspicious RCU usage
The commit eb1f00237aca ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints"), started to
expose us for tracepoints. This lead to the following RCU splat on an ARM64
Qcom board.
[ 5.529634] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[ 5.537307] sdhci-pltfm: SDHCI platform and OF driver helper
[ 5.541092] 5.9.0-rc3 #86 Not tainted
[ 5.541098] -----------------------------
[ 5.541105] ../include/trace/events/lock.h:37 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
[ 5.541110]
[ 5.541110] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 5.541110]
[ 5.541116]
[ 5.541116] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
[ 5.541122] RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state!
[ 5.541129] no locks held by swapper/0/0.
[ 5.541134]
[ 5.541134] stack backtrace:
[ 5.541143] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3 #86
[ 5.541149] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. APQ 8016 SBC (DT)
[ 5.541157] Call trace:
[ 5.568185] sdhci_msm 7864900.sdhci: Got CD GPIO
[ 5.574186] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c8
[ 5.574206] show_stack+0x14/0x20
[ 5.574229] dump_stack+0xe8/0x154
[ 5.574250] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xd4/0xf8
[ 5.574269] lock_acquire+0x3f0/0x460
[ 5.574292] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x80/0xb0
[ 5.574314] __pm_runtime_suspend+0x4c/0x188
[ 5.574341] psci_enter_domain_idle_state+0x40/0xa0
[ 5.574362] cpuidle_enter_state+0xc0/0x610
[ 5.646487] cpuidle_enter+0x38/0x50
[ 5.650651] call_cpuidle+0x18/0x40
[ 5.654467] do_idle+0x228/0x278
[ 5.657678] cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x70
[ 5.661153] rest_init+0x1a4/0x278
[ 5.665061] arch_call_rest_init+0xc/0x14
[ 5.668272] start_kernel+0x508/0x540
Following the path in pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend() from
psci_enter_domain_idle_state(), it seems like we end up using the RCU.
Therefore, let's simply silence the splat by informing the RCU about it
with RCU_NONIDLE.
Note that, this is a temporary solution. Instead we should strive to avoid
using RCU_NONIDLE (and similar), but rather push rcu_idle_enter|exit()
further down, closer to the arch specific code. However, as the CPU PM
notifiers are also using the RCU, additional rework is needed.
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c index 74463841805f..d928b37718bd 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static int psci_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, return -1; /* Do runtime PM to manage a hierarchical CPU toplogy. */ - pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(pd_dev); + RCU_NONIDLE(pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(pd_dev)); state = psci_get_domain_state(); if (!state) @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static int psci_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, ret = psci_cpu_suspend_enter(state) ? -1 : idx; - pm_runtime_get_sync(pd_dev); + RCU_NONIDLE(pm_runtime_get_sync(pd_dev)); cpu_pm_exit(); |