diff options
author | Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> | 2016-04-28 15:34:54 +1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> | 2016-05-11 21:54:03 +1000 |
commit | 201b3fe586361c0241105f6e3de2c4749010f897 (patch) | |
tree | 747af1aa063a4d9173279efa3b02e093a116d9aa | |
parent | b2ed059642875a699a195cb136b2e57e7e07cedf (diff) |
drivers/of: Add check for null property in of_remove_property()
The validity of the property input argument to of_remove_property() is
never checked within the function and thus it is possible to pass a null
value. It happens that this will be picked up in __of_remove_property()
as no matching property of the device node will be found and thus an
error will be returned, however once again there is no explicit check
for a null value. By the time this is detected 2 locks have already been
acquired which is completely unnecessary if the property to remove is
null.
Add an explicit check in the function of_remove_property() for a null
property value and return -ENODEV in this case, this is consistent with
what the previous return value would have been when the null value was
not detected and passed to __of_remove_property().
By moving an explicit check for the property paramenter into the
of_remove_property() function, this will remove the need to perform this
check in calling code before invocation of the of_remove_property()
function.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/of/base.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c index b299de2b3afa..64018ebcc861 100644 --- a/drivers/of/base.c +++ b/drivers/of/base.c @@ -1777,6 +1777,9 @@ int of_remove_property(struct device_node *np, struct property *prop) unsigned long flags; int rc; + if (!prop) + return -ENODEV; + mutex_lock(&of_mutex); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags); |