From f6a8250ea1e42ad1f4f3bab01c851ec5fd48f0e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:33:35 -0800 Subject: libbpf: Fix ring_buffer__poll() to return number of consumed samples Fix ring_buffer__poll() to return the number of non-discarded records consumed, just like its documentation states. It's also consistent with ring_buffer__consume() return. Fix up selftests with wrong expected results. Fixes: bf99c936f947 ("libbpf: Add BPF ring buffer support") Fixes: cb1c9ddd5525 ("selftests/bpf: Add BPF ringbuf selftests") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201130223336.904192-1-andrii@kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c index c1650548433c..1a48c6f7f54e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ void test_ringbuf(void) if (CHECK(err, "join_bg", "err %d\n", err)) goto cleanup; - if (CHECK(bg_ret != 1, "bg_ret", "epoll_wait result: %ld", bg_ret)) + if (CHECK(bg_ret <= 0, "bg_ret", "epoll_wait result: %ld", bg_ret)) goto cleanup; /* 3 rounds, 2 samples each */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c index 78e450609803..d37161e59bb2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ void test_ringbuf_multi(void) /* poll for samples, should get 2 ringbufs back */ err = ring_buffer__poll(ringbuf, -1); - if (CHECK(err != 4, "poll_res", "expected 4 records, got %d\n", err)) + if (CHECK(err != 2, "poll_res", "expected 2 records, got %d\n", err)) goto cleanup; /* expect extra polling to return nothing */ -- cgit v1.2.3 From 156c9b70dbfb83eeeff39e9202eb5f8bb6d0fd04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:33:36 -0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: Drain ringbuf samples at the end of test Avoid occasional test failures due to the last sample being delayed to another ring_buffer__poll() call. Instead, drain samples completely with ring_buffer__consume(). This is supposed to fix a rare and non-deterministic test failure in libbpf CI. Fixes: cb1c9ddd5525 ("selftests/bpf: Add BPF ringbuf selftests") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201130223336.904192-2-andrii@kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c index 1a48c6f7f54e..fddbc5db5d6a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c @@ -220,6 +220,12 @@ void test_ringbuf(void) if (CHECK(bg_ret <= 0, "bg_ret", "epoll_wait result: %ld", bg_ret)) goto cleanup; + /* due to timing variations, there could still be non-notified + * samples, so consume them here to collect all the samples + */ + err = ring_buffer__consume(ringbuf); + CHECK(err < 0, "rb_consume", "failed: %d\b", err); + /* 3 rounds, 2 samples each */ cnt = atomic_xchg(&sample_cnt, 0); CHECK(cnt != 6, "cnt", "exp %d samples, got %d\n", 6, cnt); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 0b5b6e747c86e57b7ebd64ccb84314a227ccfcc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Toke=20H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:57:38 +0100 Subject: selftests/bpf/test_offload.py: Remove check for program load flags match MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Since we just removed the xdp_attachment_flags_ok() callback, also remove the check for it in test_offload.py, and replace it with a test for the new ambiguity-avoid check when multiple programs are loaded. Fixes: 7f0a838254bd ("bpf, xdp: Maintain info on attached XDP BPF programs in net_device") Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160752225858.110217.13036901876869496246.stgit@toke.dk --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py | 22 +++++----------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py index 43c9cda199b8..becd27b2f4ba 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py @@ -716,13 +716,11 @@ def test_multi_prog(simdev, sim, obj, modename, modeid): fail(ret == 0, "Replaced one of programs without -force") check_extack(err, "XDP program already attached.", args) - if modename == "" or modename == "drv": - othermode = "" if modename == "drv" else "drv" - start_test("Test multi-attachment XDP - detach...") - ret, _, err = sim.unset_xdp(othermode, force=True, - fail=False, include_stderr=True) - fail(ret == 0, "Removed program with a bad mode") - check_extack(err, "program loaded with different flags.", args) + start_test("Test multi-attachment XDP - remove without mode...") + ret, _, err = sim.unset_xdp("", force=True, + fail=False, include_stderr=True) + fail(ret == 0, "Removed program without a mode flag") + check_extack(err, "More than one program loaded, unset mode is ambiguous.", args) sim.unset_xdp("offload") xdp = sim.ip_link_show(xdp=True)["xdp"] @@ -1001,16 +999,6 @@ try: check_extack(err, "native and generic XDP can't be active at the same time.", args) - ret, _, err = sim.set_xdp(obj, "", force=True, - fail=False, include_stderr=True) - fail(ret == 0, "Replaced XDP program with a program in different mode") - check_extack(err, "program loaded with different flags.", args) - - start_test("Test XDP prog remove with bad flags...") - ret, _, err = sim.unset_xdp("", force=True, - fail=False, include_stderr=True) - fail(ret == 0, "Removed program with a bad mode") - check_extack(err, "program loaded with different flags.", args) start_test("Test MTU restrictions...") ret, _ = sim.set_mtu(9000, fail=False) -- cgit v1.2.3 From d8b5e76ae4e02908d000397597c6bc2868362fbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Toke=20H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:57:40 +0100 Subject: selftests/bpf/test_offload.py: Only check verifier log on verification fails MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Since commit 6f8a57ccf851 ("bpf: Make verifier log more relevant by default"), the verifier discards log messages for successfully-verified programs. This broke test_offload.py which is looking for a verification message from the driver callback. Change test_offload.py to use the toggle in netdevsim to make the verification fail before looking for the verification message. Fixes: 6f8a57ccf851 ("bpf: Make verifier log more relevant by default") Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160752226069.110217.12370824996153348073.stgit@toke.dk --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py index becd27b2f4ba..61527b43f067 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py @@ -911,11 +911,18 @@ try: sim.tc_flush_filters() + start_test("Test TC offloads failure...") + sim.dfs["dev/bpf_bind_verifier_accept"] = 0 + ret, _, err = sim.cls_bpf_add_filter(obj, verbose=True, skip_sw=True, + fail=False, include_stderr=True) + fail(ret == 0, "TC filter did not reject with TC offloads enabled") + check_verifier_log(err, "[netdevsim] Hello from netdevsim!") + sim.dfs["dev/bpf_bind_verifier_accept"] = 1 + start_test("Test TC offloads work...") ret, _, err = sim.cls_bpf_add_filter(obj, verbose=True, skip_sw=True, fail=False, include_stderr=True) fail(ret != 0, "TC filter did not load with TC offloads enabled") - check_verifier_log(err, "[netdevsim] Hello from netdevsim!") start_test("Test TC offload basics...") dfs = simdev.dfs_get_bound_progs(expected=1) @@ -1032,6 +1039,15 @@ try: rm("/sys/fs/bpf/offload") sim.wait_for_flush() + start_test("Test XDP load failure...") + sim.dfs["dev/bpf_bind_verifier_accept"] = 0 + ret, _, err = bpftool_prog_load("sample_ret0.o", "/sys/fs/bpf/offload", + dev=sim['ifname'], fail=False, include_stderr=True) + fail(ret == 0, "verifier should fail on load") + check_verifier_log(err, "[netdevsim] Hello from netdevsim!") + sim.dfs["dev/bpf_bind_verifier_accept"] = 1 + sim.wait_for_flush() + start_test("Test XDP offload...") _, _, err = sim.set_xdp(obj, "offload", verbose=True, include_stderr=True) ipl = sim.ip_link_show(xdp=True) @@ -1039,7 +1055,6 @@ try: progs = bpftool_prog_list(expected=1) prog = progs[0] fail(link_xdp["id"] != prog["id"], "Loaded program has wrong ID") - check_verifier_log(err, "[netdevsim] Hello from netdevsim!") start_test("Test XDP offload is device bound...") dfs = simdev.dfs_get_bound_progs(expected=1) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 852c2ee338f0ac6026458615b624e1c496142cf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Toke=20H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:57:41 +0100 Subject: selftests/bpf/test_offload.py: Fix expected case of extack messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Commit 7f0a838254bd ("bpf, xdp: Maintain info on attached XDP BPF programs in net_device") changed the case of some of the extack messages being returned when attaching of XDP programs failed. This broke test_offload.py, so let's fix the test to reflect this. Fixes: 7f0a838254bd ("bpf, xdp: Maintain info on attached XDP BPF programs in net_device") Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160752226175.110217.11214100824416344952.stgit@toke.dk --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py index 61527b43f067..51a5e4d939cc 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py @@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ try: fail=False, include_stderr=True) fail(ret == 0, "Replaced XDP program with a program in different mode") check_extack(err, - "native and generic XDP can't be active at the same time.", + "Native and generic XDP can't be active at the same time.", args) start_test("Test MTU restrictions...") @@ -1035,7 +1035,7 @@ try: offload = bpf_pinned("/sys/fs/bpf/offload") ret, _, err = sim.set_xdp(offload, "drv", fail=False, include_stderr=True) fail(ret == 0, "attached offloaded XDP program to drv") - check_extack(err, "using device-bound program without HW_MODE flag is not supported.", args) + check_extack(err, "Using device-bound program without HW_MODE flag is not supported.", args) rm("/sys/fs/bpf/offload") sim.wait_for_flush() -- cgit v1.2.3 From 766e62b7fcd2cf1d43e6594ba37c659dc48f7ddb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Toke=20H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:57:42 +0100 Subject: selftests/bpf/test_offload.py: Reset ethtool features after failed setting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit When setting the ethtool feature flag fails (as expected for the test), the kernel now tracks that the feature was requested to be 'off' and refuses to subsequently disable it again. So reset it back to 'on' so a subsequent disable (that's not supposed to fail) can succeed. Fixes: 417ec26477a5 ("selftests/bpf: add offload test based on netdevsim") Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160752226280.110217.10696241563705667871.stgit@toke.dk --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py index 51a5e4d939cc..2128fbd8414b 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py @@ -946,6 +946,7 @@ try: start_test("Test disabling TC offloads is rejected while filters installed...") ret, _ = sim.set_ethtool_tc_offloads(False, fail=False) fail(ret == 0, "Driver should refuse to disable TC offloads with filters installed...") + sim.set_ethtool_tc_offloads(True) start_test("Test qdisc removal frees things...") sim.tc_flush_filters() -- cgit v1.2.3 From 8158cad13435639cd4962fb88970960f880ef6d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Toke=20H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:57:43 +0100 Subject: selftests/bpf/test_offload.py: Filter bpftool internal map when counting maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit A few of the tests in test_offload.py expects to see a certain number of maps created, and checks this by counting the number of maps returned by bpftool. There is already a filter that will remove any maps already there at the beginning of the test, but bpftool now creates a map for the PID iterator rodata on each invocation, which makes the map count wrong. Fix this by also filtering the pid_iter.rodata map by name when counting. Fixes: d53dee3fe013 ("tools/bpftool: Show info for processes holding BPF map/prog/link/btf FDs") Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160752226387.110217.9887866138149423444.stgit@toke.dk --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py index 2128fbd8414b..b99bb8ed3ed4 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py @@ -184,9 +184,7 @@ def bpftool_prog_list(expected=None, ns=""): def bpftool_map_list(expected=None, ns=""): _, maps = bpftool("map show", JSON=True, ns=ns, fail=True) # Remove the base maps - for m in base_maps: - if m in maps: - maps.remove(m) + maps = [m for m in maps if m not in base_maps and m.get('name') not in base_map_names] if expected is not None: if len(maps) != expected: fail(True, "%d BPF maps loaded, expected %d" % @@ -770,6 +768,9 @@ ret, progs = bpftool("prog", fail=False) skip(ret != 0, "bpftool not installed") base_progs = progs _, base_maps = bpftool("map") +base_map_names = [ + 'pid_iter.rodata' # created on each bpftool invocation +] # Check netdevsim ret, out = cmd("modprobe netdevsim", fail=False) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 511a76bcb0ce242a19153658b25437906cc6070e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jean-Philippe Brucker Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:01:52 +0100 Subject: selftests/bpf: Add test for signed 32-bit bound check bug After a 32-bit load followed by a branch, the verifier would reduce the maximum bound of the register to 0x7fffffff, allowing a user to bypass bound checks. Ensure such a program is rejected. In the second test, the 64-bit compare should not sufficient to determine whether the signed 32-bit lower bound is 0, so the verifier should reject the second branch. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index dac40de3f868..57ed67b86074 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -703,3 +703,44 @@ .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .result = ACCEPT, }, +{ + "bounds checks after 32-bit truncation. test 1", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), + /* This used to reduce the max bound to 0x7fffffff */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, 0x7fffffff, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, +}, +{ + "bounds checks after 32-bit truncation. test 2", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 1), + BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, +}, -- cgit v1.2.3 From 77ce220c0549dcc3db8226c61c60e83fc59dfafc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jean-Philippe Brucker Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:01:53 +0100 Subject: selftests/bpf: Fix array access with signed variable test The test fails because of a recent fix to the verifier, even though this program is valid. In details what happens is: 7: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0) Load a 32-bit value, with signed bounds [S32_MIN, S32_MAX]. The bounds of the 64-bit value are [0, U32_MAX]... 8: (65) if r1 s> 0xffffffff goto pc+1 ... therefore this is always true (the operand is sign-extended). 10: (b4) w2 = 11 11: (6d) if r2 s> r1 goto pc+1 When true, the 64-bit bounds become [0, 10]. The 32-bit bounds are still [S32_MIN, 10]. 13: (64) w1 <<= 2 Because this is a 32-bit operation, the verifier propagates the new 32-bit bounds to the 64-bit ones, and the knowledge gained from insn 11 is lost. 14: (0f) r0 += r1 15: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 +0) = 4 Then the verifier considers r0 unbounded here, rejecting the test. To make the test work, change insn 8 to check the sign of the 32-bit value. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c index 1c4b1939f5a8..bed53b561e04 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), - BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff, 1), + BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff, 1), BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, MAX_ENTRIES), BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1), -- cgit v1.2.3 From 3615bdf6d9b19db12b1589861609b4f1c6a8d303 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jean-Philippe Brucker Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:01:54 +0100 Subject: selftests/bpf: Fix "dubious pointer arithmetic" test The verifier trace changed following a bugfix. After checking the 64-bit sign, only the upper bit mask is known, not bit 31. Update the test accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c index 52414058a627..5861446d0777 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c @@ -456,10 +456,10 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { */ {7, "R5_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-9223372036854775806,smax_value=9223372036854775806,umin_value=2,umax_value=18446744073709551614,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc)"}, /* Checked s>=0 */ - {9, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372034707292158,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fffffff7ffffffc)"}, + {9, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, /* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */ - {11, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372034707292158,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fffffff7ffffffc)"}, - {13, "R4_w=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372034707292158,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fffffff7ffffffc)"}, + {11, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, + {13, "R4_w=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, /* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine. * We checked the bounds, but it might have been able * to overflow if the packet pointer started in the @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { * So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access * attempt will fail. */ - {15, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372034707292158,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fffffff7ffffffc)"}, + {15, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, } }, { -- cgit v1.2.3