From 3d9fa91161387ee629e7a07c47934d119910c8ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Howells Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 22:55:59 +0100 Subject: afs: Fix VNOVOL handling in address rotation If a volume location record lists multiple file servers for a volume, then it's possible that due to a misconfiguration or a changing configuration that one of the file servers doesn't know about it yet and will abort VNOVOL. Currently, the rotation algorithm will stop with EREMOTEIO. Fix this by moving on to try the next server if VNOVOL is returned. Once all the servers have been tried and the record rechecked, the algorithm will stop with EREMOTEIO or ENOMEDIUM. Fixes: d2ddc776a458 ("afs: Overhaul volume and server record caching and fileserver rotation") Reported-by: Marc Dionne Signed-off-by: David Howells --- fs/afs/rotate.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/afs') diff --git a/fs/afs/rotate.c b/fs/afs/rotate.c index 84584dcced72..e065bc0768e6 100644 --- a/fs/afs/rotate.c +++ b/fs/afs/rotate.c @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ bool afs_select_fileserver(struct afs_fs_cursor *fc) */ if (fc->flags & AFS_FS_CURSOR_VNOVOL) { fc->ac.error = -EREMOTEIO; - goto failed; + goto next_server; } write_lock(&vnode->volume->servers_lock); @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ bool afs_select_fileserver(struct afs_fs_cursor *fc) */ if (vnode->volume->servers == fc->server_list) { fc->ac.error = -EREMOTEIO; - goto failed; + goto next_server; } /* Try again */ -- cgit v1.2.3