From 9167f0dcc523735d5df7c6e27b58c05740433657 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 22:34:35 -0600 Subject: scsi: xen-scsifront: mark expected switch fall-through In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Missed the backend's Closing state -- fallthrough" with "fall through - Missed the backend's Closing state", which contains the "fall through" annotation at the beginnig of the code comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen --- drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers') diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c index 61389bdc7926..bb76d0d2022b 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c @@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@ static void scsifront_backend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, case XenbusStateClosed: if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) break; - /* Missed the backend's Closing state -- fallthrough */ + /* fall through - Missed the backend's Closing state */ case XenbusStateClosing: scsifront_disconnect(info); break; -- cgit v1.2.3