From 43f789792e2c7ea2bff37195e4c4b4239e9e02b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aleksi Torhamo Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 20:08:48 +0200 Subject: drm/nvc0/fb: fix crash when different mutex is used to protect same list Fixes regression introduced in commit 861d2107 "drm/nouveau/fb: merge fb/vram and port to subdev interfaces" nv50_fb_vram_{new,del} functions were changed to use nouveau_subdev->mutex instead of the old nouveau_mm->mutex. nvc0_fb_vram_new still uses the nouveau_mm->mutex, but nvc0 doesn't have its own fb_vram_del function, using nv50_fb_vram_del instead. Because of this, on nvc0 a different mutex ends up being used to protect additions and deletions to the same list. This patch is a -stable candidate for 3.7. Signed-off-by: Aleksi Torhamo Reported-by: Roy Spliet Tested-by: Roy Spliet Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/gpu') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c index 306bdf121452..7606ed15b6fa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c @@ -145,14 +145,14 @@ nvc0_fb_vram_new(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, u64 size, u32 align, u32 ncmin, mem->memtype = type; mem->size = size; - mutex_lock(&mm->mutex); + mutex_lock(&pfb->base.mutex); do { if (back) ret = nouveau_mm_tail(mm, 1, size, ncmin, align, &r); else ret = nouveau_mm_head(mm, 1, size, ncmin, align, &r); if (ret) { - mutex_unlock(&mm->mutex); + mutex_unlock(&pfb->base.mutex); pfb->ram.put(pfb, &mem); return ret; } @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ nvc0_fb_vram_new(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, u64 size, u32 align, u32 ncmin, list_add_tail(&r->rl_entry, &mem->regions); size -= r->length; } while (size); - mutex_unlock(&mm->mutex); + mutex_unlock(&pfb->base.mutex); r = list_first_entry(&mem->regions, struct nouveau_mm_node, rl_entry); mem->offset = (u64)r->offset << 12; -- cgit v1.2.3